These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514540)
1. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology. Tanabodee J; Thepsuwan K; Karalak A; Laoaree O; Krachang A; Manmatt K; Anontwatanawong N Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7381-4. PubMed ID: 26514540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®). Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases. Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study. Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for detection of uterine cervical lesions: a prospective observational study. Nishio H; Iwata T; Nomura H; Morisada T; Takeshima N; Takano H; Sasaki H; Nakatani E; Teramukai S; Aoki D Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 48(6):522-528. PubMed ID: 29668969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening in Luxembourg. Latsuzbaia A; Hebette G; Fischer M; Arbyn M; Weyers S; Vielh P; Schmitt F; Mossong J Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 May; 45(5):384-390. PubMed ID: 28247516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening]. Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population. Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Longatto-Filho A; Levi JE; Martins TR; Cohen D; Cury L; Villa LL; Eluf-Neto J Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 26279162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital. Khaengkhor P; Mairaing K; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J; Bhamarapravatana K J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21534360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China. Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities. Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 25824759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions. Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand. Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting. Hussein T; Desai M; Tomlinson A; Kitchener HC BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China. Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators. Placidi A; Capparucci P; Di Luzio A; Manca G; Mania E; Filippini T; Giorgi Rossi P Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 27504992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Based on Cervical Cytology Specimen. Sangpichai S; Patarapadungkit N; Pientong C; Ekalaksananan T; Chaiwiriyakul S; Thongbor R; Sirivech P; Jangsiriwitayakorn P; Triamwittayanon T Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Dec; 20(12):3843-3847. PubMed ID: 31870131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cytopathological changes in pregnancy: An experience from a low resource setting. Rasheed FA; Yakasai IA; Takai IU; Yusuf I; Ibrahim UM Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(3):212-221. PubMed ID: 34558451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Rozemeijer K; Penning C; Siebers AG; Naber SK; Matthijsse SM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; de Kok IM Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Jan; 27(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 26458884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]