These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514634)

  • 1. R/S Ratio Variability in Lead V1 Observed between Selected Four 1-Minute ECG Fragments of 24-Hour ECG as a Predictor of Incomplete Resynchronization during Full 24-Hour ECG: Pilot Study.
    Pyszno-Prokopowicz D; Baranowski R; Bodalski R; Madej M; Piotrowicz R
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2016 Jul; 21(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 26514634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the QRS morphology in lead V1 during 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram monitoring to evaluate function of a cardiac resynchronisation therapy device in patients with sinus rhythm: a pilot study.
    Pyszno-Prokopowicz D; Madej M; Baranowski R; Piotrowicz R
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(6):404-10. PubMed ID: 25563470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Wang Y; Zhu H; Hou X; Wang Z; Zou F; Qian Z; Wei Y; Wang X; Zhang L; Li X; Liu Z; Xue S; Qin C; Zeng J; Li H; Wu H; Ma H; Ellenbogen KA; Gold MR; Fan X; Zou J;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 80(13):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 36137670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.
    Lustgarten DL; Crespo EM; Arkhipova-Jenkins I; Lobel R; Winget J; Koehler J; Liberman E; Sheldon T
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 25828601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel ultra-high-frequency electrocardiogram tool for the description of the ventricular depolarization pattern before and during cardiac resynchronization.
    Jurak P; Curila K; Leinveber P; Prinzen FW; Viscor I; Plesinger F; Smisek R; Prochazkova R; Osmancik P; Halamek J; Matejkova M; Lipoldova J; Novak M; Panovsky R; Andrla P; Vondra V; Stros P; Vesela J; Herman D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):300-307. PubMed ID: 31788894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The concept of triple wavefront fusion during biventricular pacing: Using the EGM to produce the best acute hemodynamic improvement in CRT.
    Ter Horst IAH; Bogaard MD; Tuinenburg AE; Mast TP; de Boer TP; Doevendans PAFM; Meine M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 40(7):873-882. PubMed ID: 28543106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prominent R wave in ECG lead V1 predicts improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with or without left bundle branch block.
    Bode WD; Bode MF; Gettes L; Jensen BC; Mounsey JP; Chung EH
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Oct; 12(10):2141-7. PubMed ID: 26048194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RV-only pacing can produce a Q wave in lead 1 and an R wave in V1: implications for biventricular pacing.
    Cooper JM; Patel RK; Emmi A; Wang Y; Kirkpatrick JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 May; 37(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 24372196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atrial fibrillation incidence and impact of biventricular pacing on long-term outcome in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Jacobsson J; Reitan C; Carlson J; Borgquist R; Platonov PG
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Aug; 19(1):195. PubMed ID: 31409276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ECG in cardiac resynchronization therapy: influence of left and right ventricular preactivation and relation to acute response.
    Bogaard MD; Hesselink T; Meine M; Loh P; Hauer RN; Cramer MJ; Doevendans PA; Tuinenburg AE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1237-45. PubMed ID: 22734629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
    Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new simplified electrocardiographic score predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with CRT.
    Végh EM; Kandala J; Januszkiewicz L; Ren J; Miller A; Orencole M; Blendea D; Merkely B; Gellér L; Singh JP; Borgquist R
    Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 28160485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction.
    Lumens J; Ploux S; Strik M; Gorcsan J; Cochet H; Derval N; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P; Arts T; Delhaas T; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(25):2395-2403. PubMed ID: 24013057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Mollo R; Cosenza A; Coviello I; Stazi A; Russo G; Villano A; Sestito A; Bencardino G; Lanza GA; Crea F
    Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1615-21. PubMed ID: 23794613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.
    Hua J; Chen Y; Yu J; Xiong Q; Xia Z; Xia Z; Huang Q; Kong Q; Chen H; Zhang Y; Hu J; Li J; Hu J; Chen Q; Hong K
    Heart Vessels; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1162-1174. PubMed ID: 35088204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocardiography of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Pitfalls and practical tips.
    Manolis AS; Manolis AA; Manolis TA; Melita H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3228-3244. PubMed ID: 34664758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a novel predictor of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Yagishita D; Shoda M; Yagishita Y; Ejima K; Hagiwara N
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Mar; 16(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 30193853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permanent His bundle pacing to replace biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Scherlag BJ; Papaila A
    Med Hypotheses; 2017 Nov; 109():77-79. PubMed ID: 29150300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double left ventricular pacing following accidental malpositioning of the right ventricular electrode during implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device.
    Dissmann R; Wolthoff U; Zabel M
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 8():162. PubMed ID: 23806123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.