343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514699)
1. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applications of Bayesian shrinkage prior models in clinical research with categorical responses.
Bhattacharyya A; Pal S; Mitra R; Rai S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35484507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events.
Ambler G; Seaman S; Omar RZ
Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1150-61. PubMed ID: 21997569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers.
Greenwood CJ; Youssef GJ; Letcher P; Macdonald JA; Hagg LJ; Sanson A; Mcintosh J; Hutchinson DM; Toumbourou JW; Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M; Olsson CA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242730. PubMed ID: 33216811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction models for clustered data with informative priors for the random effects: a simulation study.
Ni H; Groenwold RHH; Nielen M; Klugkist I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of likelihood penalization and variance decomposition approaches for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Lohmann A; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M
Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200108. PubMed ID: 37199142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Harrell FE; Habbema JD
Stat Med; 2000 Apr; 19(8):1059-79. PubMed ID: 10790680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of complex modeling strategies for prediction of a binary outcome based on a few, highly correlated predictors.
Chiabudini M; Schumacher M; Graf E
Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):568-582. PubMed ID: 32227652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonidentical twins: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian lasso for Cox models.
Zucknick M; Saadati M; Benner A
Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):959-81. PubMed ID: 26417963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable Selection for Confounding Adjustment in High-dimensional Covariate Spaces When Analyzing Healthcare Databases.
Schneeweiss S; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Patorno E; Rassen J; Franklin JM
Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 27779497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models.
Iba K; Shinozaki T; Maruo K; Noma H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 33413132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian clinical classification from high-dimensional data: Signatures versus variability.
Shalabi A; Inoue M; Watkins J; De Rinaldis E; Coolen AC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):336-351. PubMed ID: 26984907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The lasso--a novel method for predictive covariate model building in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Ribbing J; Nyberg J; Caster O; Jonsson EN
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Aug; 34(4):485-517. PubMed ID: 17516152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust distributed lag models using data adaptive shrinkage.
Chen YH; Mukherjee B; Adar SD; Berrocal VJ; Coull BA
Biostatistics; 2018 Oct; 19(4):461-478. PubMed ID: 29040386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
