These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26515196)

  • 1. Improving protein-ligand docking with flexible interfacial water molecules using SWRosettaLigand.
    Li L; Xu W; Lü Q
    J Mol Model; 2015 Nov; 21(11):294. PubMed ID: 26515196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards ligand docking including explicit interface water molecules.
    Lemmon G; Meiler J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67536. PubMed ID: 23840735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
    Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-Body Interactions in Molecular Docking Program Devised with Key Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites.
    Xiao W; Wang D; Shen Z; Li S; Li H
    Molecules; 2018 Sep; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 30208655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling loop backbone flexibility in receptor-ligand docking simulations.
    Flick J; Tristram F; Wenzel W
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Dec; 33(31):2504-15. PubMed ID: 22886372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
    Davis IW; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
    Roberts BC; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 7. Impact of protein flexibility and water molecules on docking-based virtual screening accuracy.
    Therrien E; Weill N; Tomberg A; Corbeil CR; Lee D; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3198-210. PubMed ID: 25280064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully Flexible Docking of Medium Sized Ligand Libraries with RosettaLigand.
    DeLuca S; Khar K; Meiler J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132508. PubMed ID: 26207742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.
    Yu W; Lakkaraju SK; Raman EP; Fang L; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 25622696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 1. Development and validation of FITTED 1.0.
    Corbeil CR; Englebienne P; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 17305329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
    Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm.
    Wu G; Robertson DH; Brooks CL; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1549-62. PubMed ID: 12925999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CIFDock: A novel CHARMM-based flexible receptor-flexible ligand docking protocol.
    Vankayala SL; Warrensford LC; Pittman AR; Pollard BC; Kearns FL; Larkin JD; Woodcock HL
    J Comput Chem; 2022 Jan; 43(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 34741467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.
    Elokely KM; Doerksen RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1934-45. PubMed ID: 23530568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.