These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26516319)

  • 1. Comparison of Prostatic Tissue Processed by Microwave and Conventional Technique Using Morphometry.
    Jain P; Kumar S; Arora B; Singh S; Chabbra S; Sen R
    Iran J Pathol; 2015; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26516319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Domestic microwave versus conventional tissue processing: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.
    Devi R B; A R S; Parameaswari PJ; Parijatham BO
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 May; 7(5):835-9. PubMed ID: 23814723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of microwave oven-assisted tissue processing and conventional method of tissue processing on turnaround laboratory time and morphological quality of tissue sections.
    FinNie O; Aye SA; Krishnappa P; Ravindran R
    Med J Malaysia; 2023 Mar; 78(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 36988531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of different histoprocessing methods.
    Singla K; Sandhu SV; Pal RAGK; Bansal H; Bhullar RK; Kaur P
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2017; 11(2):28-34. PubMed ID: 28539860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of routine and rapid microwave tissue processing in a surgical pathology laboratory. Quality of histologic sections and advantages of microwave processing.
    Rohr LR; Layfield LJ; Wallin D; Hardy D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 May; 115(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 11345834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microwave technique in histopathology and its comparison with the conventional technique.
    Chaudhari K; Chattopadhyay A; Dutta SK
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 43(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 11344600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microwave histoprocessing versus conventional histoprocessing.
    Mathai AM; Naik R; Pai MR; Rai S; Baliga P
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2008; 51(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18417842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the quality of the microwave cell-block method with the conventional cell-block method in processing body fluid samples.
    Jayakumar C; Sreerekha J; Gochhait D; Perumal PV; Kanungo S; Siddaraju N; Gochhait S; Ramatchandrin L
    Cytopathology; 2021 Jan; 32(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 32888217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study on microwave and routine tissue processing.
    Babu TM; Malathi N; Magesh KT
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21525677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microwave-Based Rapid Tissue Processing Technique: A Novel Aid in Histopathologic Laboratory.
    Mishra P; Bandyopadhyay A; Kumar H; Dash KC; Bhuyan L; Panda A
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S566-S570. PubMed ID: 34447154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple and rapid microwave-assisted hematoxylin and eosin staining method using 1,1,1 trichloroethane as a dewaxing and a clearing agent.
    Temel SG; Noyan S; Cavusoglu I; Kahveci Z
    Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):123-32. PubMed ID: 16298897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of immunohistochemical stain quality in conventional and rapid microwave processed tissues.
    Emerson LL; Tripp SR; Baird BC; Layfield LJ; Rohr LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Feb; 125(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 16393680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accelerated staining technique using kitchen microwave oven.
    Mukunda A; Narayan TV; Shreedhar B; Shashidhara R; Mohanty L; Shenoy S
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 26275253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuous-specimen-flow, high-throughput, 1-hour tissue processing. A system for rapid diagnostic tissue preparation.
    Morales AR; Essenfeld H; Essenfeld E; Duboue MC; Vincek V; Nadji M
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 May; 126(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 11958665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microwave-assisted tissue processing, fixation and staining in tissues of different thicknesses: A comparative study.
    Rao M; Pai SM; Khanagar SB; Siddeeqh S; Devang DD; Naik S
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2020; 24(1):186. PubMed ID: 32508477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Efficacy of Microwave Staining over Conventional Staining in Replicating Tissue Architecture: A Prospective Study.
    Priya AHH; Venkatanarasu VB; Chellaswamy S; Jeyaraj M; Francis SF; Rajasekaran S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S283-S288. PubMed ID: 33149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Conventional and Microwave Tissue Processing Technique on DNA Integrity: A Comparative Molecular Analysis.
    Dwivedi D; Kasetty S; Tijare MS; Kallianpur S; Prabhakar N; Ragavendra RT; Desai A
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2018 Sep; 28(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 30607077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of clarity of nucleocytoplasmic differentiation of oral tissues processed by microwave and conventional methods.
    K SN; Patel S; Astekar M; Rao D
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Apr; 16(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 22050966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of routine fixation of tissues with rapid tissue fixation.
    Tripathi M; Bansal R; Gupta M; Bharat V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Dec; 7(12):2768-73. PubMed ID: 24551633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microwave processing: A boon for oral pathologists.
    Kango PG; Deshmukh R
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2011 Jan; 15(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 21731271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.