These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26516443)

  • 1. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining Changes in Electromyography Indices when Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.
    Salehi Sahl Abadi A; Mazloumi A; Nasl Saraji G; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2018 Mar; 8(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 29732342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in Back Compressive Force When Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.
    Salehi Sahl Abadi A; Nasl Saraji G; Mazloumi A; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 27957465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of lift moment in determining MAWL.
    Davis KG; Kirking BC; Gaudes LL; Yang J; Marras WS
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 9302891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.
    Chen YL; Ho TK
    Ind Health; 2016 Dec; 54(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 27181917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.
    Alferdaws FF; Ramadan MZ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32357502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can Chinese MAWL be used for designing manual handling tasks?
    Chen YL
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 12570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].
    Xiao GB; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 18771617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable frequency of lift for combined manual material handling task in Malaysia.
    Widia M; Md Dawal SZ; Yusoff N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216918. PubMed ID: 31141545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.
    Ghaleb AM; Ramadan MZ; Badwelan A; Saad Aljaloud K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31671827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of floor slope on submaximal lifting capacity.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():283-9. PubMed ID: 15133972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.