These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26516443)

  • 21. An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.
    Garg A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 2718909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Obesity does not reduce maximum acceptable weights of lift.
    Singh D; Park W; Levy MS
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18501874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An isoinertial predictor for maximal acceptable lifting weights of Chinese male subjects.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 May; 57(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 8638516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using Electroencephalography (EEG) Power Responses to Investigate the Effects of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on the Worker's Activities.
    Ramadan MZ; Ghaleb AM; Ragab AE
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7956037. PubMed ID: 32337279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are psychophysically chosen lifting loads based on joint kinetics?
    Banks JJ; Caldwell GE
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():17-23. PubMed ID: 30487096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for asymmetric lifting.
    Cheng TS; Lee TH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1339-46. PubMed ID: 12929792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of floor slope on sub-maximal lifting capacity and technique.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 18096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses to continuous box lifting and lowering in nonimpaired subjects.
    Chaloupka EC; Kang J; Mastrangelo MA; Scibilia G; Leder GM; Angelucci J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 May; 30(5):249-57; discussion 258-62. PubMed ID: 10817412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of container design and stair climbing on maximal acceptable lift weight, wrist posture, psychophysical, and physiological responses in wafer-handling tasks.
    Chung HC; Wang MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Dec; 32(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 11703045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximum weights of asymmetrical loads acceptable to industrial workers for symmetrical manual lifting.
    Mital A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jun; 48(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 3618467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers.
    Ljungberg AS; Kilbom A; Hägg GM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 2924762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
    Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 15676920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.