These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26517363)

  • 1. Effect of Exogenous Cues on Covert Spatial Orienting in Deaf and Normal Hearing Individuals.
    Prasad SG; Patil GS; Mishra RK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141324. PubMed ID: 26517363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional orienting to social and nonsocial cues in early deaf adults.
    Heimler B; van Zoest W; Baruffaldi F; Rinaldi P; Caselli MC; Pavani F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1758-71. PubMed ID: 26280262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.
    Bottari D; Nava E; Ley P; Pavani F
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20404406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of offset cues on saccade programming and covert attention.
    Smith DT; Casteau S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 29372674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of exogenous and endogenous cues on attentional orienting in deaf adults.
    Li Y; Luo M; Zhang X; Wang S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1038468. PubMed ID: 36275214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students.
    Tao J; Qin Z; Meng Z; Zhang L; Liu L; Yan G; Benson V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221891. PubMed ID: 31513606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults.
    Jayaraman S; Klein RM; Hilchey MD; Patil GS; Mishra RK
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):323-30. PubMed ID: 26474575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding the balance between capture and control: Oculomotor selection in early deaf adults.
    Heimler B; van Zoest W; Baruffaldi F; Donk M; Rinaldi P; Caselli MC; Pavani F
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():12-27. PubMed ID: 25829265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.
    Dye MW; Baril DE; Bavelier D
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1801-11. PubMed ID: 17291549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye-movement patterns to social and non-social cues in early deaf adults.
    Bonmassar C; Pavani F; Di Renzo A; Caselli MC; van Zoest W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jun; 74(6):1021-1036. PubMed ID: 33586487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading.
    Bélanger NN; Slattery TJ; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 22683830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention capture by brief abrupt-onset cues in deaf individuals.
    Prasad S; Patil GS; Somashekarappa V; Mishra RK
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Mar; 167():108157. PubMed ID: 35051508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses to targets in the visual periphery in deaf and normal-hearing adults.
    Rothpletz AM; Ashmead DH; Thorpe AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1378-86. PubMed ID: 14700362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Counterproductive effect of saccadic suppression during attention shifts.
    Zénon A; Corneil BD; Alamia A; Filali-Sadouk N; Olivier E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86633. PubMed ID: 24466181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oculomotor readiness and covert orienting: differences between central and peripheral precues.
    Reuter-Lorenz PA; Fendrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 1408644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrical microstimulation of primate posterior parietal cortex initiates orienting and alerting components of covert attention.
    Cutrell EB; Marrocco RT
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 11976764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.