BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26518695)

  • 1. Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments.
    Jiang P; Wang H; Li W; Zang C; Li B; Wong YJ; Meyer C; Liu JS; Aster JC; Liu XS
    Genome Biol; 2015 Oct; 16():239. PubMed ID: 26518695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PICKLES: the database of pooled in-vitro CRISPR knockout library essentiality screens.
    Lenoir WF; Lim TL; Hart T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(D1):D776-D780. PubMed ID: 29077937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control, modeling, and visualization of CRISPR screens with MAGeCK-VISPR.
    Li W; Köster J; Xu H; Chen CH; Xiao T; Liu JS; Brown M; Liu XS
    Genome Biol; 2015 Dec; 16():281. PubMed ID: 26673418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring cancer dependencies on metabolic genes from large-scale genetic screens.
    Lagziel S; Lee WD; Shlomi T
    BMC Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 31039782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACE: a probabilistic model for characterizing gene-level essentiality in CRISPR screens.
    Hutton ER; Vakoc CR; Siepel A
    Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 34556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OGEE v3: Online GEne Essentiality database with increased coverage of organisms and human cell lines.
    Gurumayum S; Jiang P; Hao X; Campos TL; Young ND; Korhonen PK; Gasser RB; Bork P; Zhao XM; He LJ; Chen WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jan; 49(D1):D998-D1003. PubMed ID: 33084874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A High-Resolution Genome-Wide CRISPR/Cas9 Viability Screen Reveals Structural Features and Contextual Diversity of the Human Cell-Essential Proteome.
    Bertomeu T; Coulombe-Huntington J; Chatr-Aryamontri A; Bourdages KG; Coyaud E; Raught B; Xia Y; Tyers M
    Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):. PubMed ID: 29038160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of CRISPR-Cas9, shRNA with other genomic data provides reliable predicions of gene essentiality.
    Rubio A
    EBioMedicine; 2020 Jan; 51():102577. PubMed ID: 31901860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide CRISPR-dCas9 screens in E. coli identify essential genes and phage host factors.
    Rousset F; Cui L; Siouve E; Becavin C; Depardieu F; Bikard D
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1007749. PubMed ID: 30403660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics.
    Hart T; Brown KR; Sircoulomb F; Rottapel R; Moffat J
    Mol Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 10(7):733. PubMed ID: 24987113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved analysis of CRISPR fitness screens and reduced off-target effects with the BAGEL2 gene essentiality classifier.
    Kim E; Hart T
    Genome Med; 2021 Jan; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 33407829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CEN-tools: an integrative platform to identify the contexts of essential genes.
    Sharma S; Dincer C; Weidemüller P; Wright GJ; Petsalaki E
    Mol Syst Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e9698. PubMed ID: 33073517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seed-effect modeling improves the consistency of genome-wide loss-of-function screens and identifies synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in cancer cells.
    Jaiswal A; Peddinti G; Akimov Y; Wennerberg K; Kuznetsov S; Tang J; Aittokallio T
    Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):51. PubMed ID: 28569207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome.
    Wang T; Birsoy K; Hughes NW; Krupczak KM; Post Y; Wei JJ; Lander ES; Sabatini DM
    Science; 2015 Nov; 350(6264):1096-101. PubMed ID: 26472758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting essential genes based on network and sequence analysis.
    Hwang YC; Lin CC; Chang JY; Mori H; Juan HF; Huang HC
    Mol Biosyst; 2009 Dec; 5(12):1672-8. PubMed ID: 19452048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrative platform to translate gene sets to networks.
    Laakso M; Hautaniemi S
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 26(14):1802-3. PubMed ID: 20507894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WU-CRISPR: characteristics of functional guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
    Wong N; Liu W; Wang X
    Genome Biol; 2015 Nov; 16():218. PubMed ID: 26521937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of functional regulatory elements in the human genome using pooled CRISPR screens.
    Borys SM; Younger ST
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):107. PubMed ID: 32005150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prioritizing genes for pathway impact using network analysis.
    Chang AN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 563():141-56. PubMed ID: 19597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of Cancer Gene Profiling Data.
    Roy J; Winter C; Schroeder M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1381():211-22. PubMed ID: 26667463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.