401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520681)
1. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months.
He D; He X; Zhao T; Wang J; Li L; Louwerse M
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():680. PubMed ID: 32477200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks.
Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Maxwell EC; Nicholls ME; Smilek D
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1190-9. PubMed ID: 19660746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.
Bull R; Benson PJ
Horm Behav; 2006 Aug; 50(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 16595134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
Hesse PN; Bremmer F
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
Tan S; Dixon P
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.
van Dijck JP; Abrahamse EL; Acar F; Ketels B; Fias W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1500-13. PubMed ID: 24749504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
