185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520694)
1. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Bortolami O; Bartolozzi P
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1057-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22397857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Pieringer H; Auersperg V; Böhler N
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 16781399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.
Chang CY; Wu CT; Numan H; Kuo FC; Wang JW; Lee MS
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):682-687. PubMed ID: 32943318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect.
Blacha J; Gagała J
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 6(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 17618213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():194076. PubMed ID: 24967339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years.
Wachtl SW; Jung M; Jakob RP; Gautier E
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):959-63. PubMed ID: 11112187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: an assessment of the graft's ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision.
Abolghasemian M; Sadeghi Naini M; Tangsataporn S; Lee P; Backstein D; Safir O; Kuzyk P; Gross AE
Bone Joint J; 2014 Mar; 96-B(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 24589785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.
Xiao Q; Wang H; Zhou K; Wang D; Ling T; Pei F; Zhou Z
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 31699067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.
Chen HT; Wu CT; Huang TW; Shih HN; Wang JW; Lee MS
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2364269. PubMed ID: 29511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study.
Coscujuela-Mañá A; Angles F; Tramunt C; Casanova X
Hip Int; 2010; 20 Suppl 7():S112-8. PubMed ID: 20512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.
Malahias MA; Sarantis M; Gkiatas I; Jang SJ; Gu A; Thorey F; Alexiades MM; Nikolaou VS
Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):705-715. PubMed ID: 35658595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision of type III and type IVB acetabular defects with Burch-Schneider anti-Protrusio cages.
Ilyas I; Alrumaih HA; Kashif S; Rabbani SA; Faqihi AH
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 25280395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural Allograft Supporting a Trabecular Metal Cup Provides Durable Results in Complex Revision Arthroplasty.
Prieto HA; Kralovec ME; Berry DJ; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ; Cabanela ME
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3488-3494. PubMed ID: 28662954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of massive acetabular bone defects in revision arthroplasty of the hip using a reconstruction cage and porous metal augment.
Mäkinen TJ; Abolghasemian M; Watts E; Fichman SG; Kuzyk P; Safir OA; Gross AE
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):607-613. PubMed ID: 28455469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
