869 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520750)
1. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward optimal organ at risk sparing in complex volumetric modulated arc therapy: an exponential trade-off with target volume dose homogeneity.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021722. PubMed ID: 24506613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.
Miguel-Chumacero E; Currie G; Johnston A; Currie S
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):229. PubMed ID: 30470254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer.
Tol JP; Delaney AR; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 25680603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1818. PubMed ID: 27036579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can knowledge-based DVH predictions be used for automated, individualized quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans?
Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():234. PubMed ID: 26584574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A longitudinal evaluation of improvements in radiotherapy treatment plan quality for head and neck cancer patients.
Tol JP; Doornaert P; Witte BI; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Radiother Oncol; 2016 May; 119(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 27130730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different treatment planning protocols can lead to large differences in organ at risk sparing.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Nov; 113(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 25454173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is accurate contouring of salivary and swallowing structures necessary to spare them in head and neck VMAT plans?
Delaney AR; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WFAR
Radiother Oncol; 2018 May; 127(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 29605479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton arc reduces range uncertainty effects and improves conformality compared with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Seco J; Gu G; Marcelos T; Kooy H; Willers H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 23920395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
