214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520752)
1. A pencil beam approach to proton computed tomography.
Rescigno R; Bopp C; Rousseau M; Brasse D
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6610-24. PubMed ID: 26520752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental fluence-modulated proton computed tomography by pencil beam scanning.
Dedes G; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Detrich N; Pols WMA; Rit S; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3287-3296. PubMed ID: 29786862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Filtered back-projection reconstruction for attenuation proton CT along most likely paths.
Quiñones CT; Létang JM; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3258-78. PubMed ID: 27032330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An inhomogeneous most likely path formalism for proton computed tomography.
Brooke MD; Penfold SN
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():184-195. PubMed ID: 32036335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A reconstruction approach for proton computed tomography by modeling the integral depth dose of the scanning proton pencil beam.
Chen X; Medrano M; Sun B; Hao Y; Reynoso FJ; Darafsheh A; Yang D; Zhang T; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2602-2620. PubMed ID: 35103331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scattering proton CT.
Krah N; Quiñones CT; Létang JM; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225015. PubMed ID: 32998114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An optimization algorithm for dose reduction with fluence-modulated proton CT.
Dickmann J; Rit S; Pankuch M; Johnson RP; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1895-1906. PubMed ID: 32040212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oblique incidence for broad monoenergetic proton beams.
Jette D; Yuan J; Chen W
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5683-90. PubMed ID: 21158280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-dimensional noise reconstruction in proton computed tomography using distance-driven filtered back-projection of simulated projections.
Rädler M; Landry G; Rit S; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215009. PubMed ID: 30277469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality of list-mode proton imaging without front trackers.
Rambo Sølie J; Volz L; Egil Seime Pettersen H; Piersimoni P; Harald Odland O; Röhrich D; Helstrup H; Peitzmann T; Ullaland K; Varga-Kofarago M; Mehendale S; Slettevoll Grøttvik O; Nilsen Eikeland V; Meric I; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(13):135012. PubMed ID: 32344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical simulator of proton radiography and tomography for different detector configurations.
Gianoli C; Meyer S; Magallanes L; Paganelli C; Baroni G; Parodi K
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():92-99. PubMed ID: 30928071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Filtered backprojection proton CT reconstruction along most likely paths.
Rit S; Dedes G; Freud N; Sarrut D; Létang JM
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031103. PubMed ID: 23464283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extension of the Fermi-Eyges most-likely path in heterogeneous medium with prior knowledge information.
Collins-Fekete CA; Bär E; Volz L; Bouchard H; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):9207-9219. PubMed ID: 29059051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: a Monte Carlo study.
Li T; Liang Z; Singanallur JV; Satogata TJ; Williams DC; Schulte RW
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 16878573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.
Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MCNPX simulation of proton dose distributions in a water phantom.
Lee CC; Lee YJ; Chen SK; Chiang BH; Tung CJ; Chao TC
Biomed J; 2015; 38(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 26459794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of activity pencil beam algorithm using measured distribution data of positron emitter nuclei generated by proton irradiation of targets containing (12)C, (16)O, and (40)Ca nuclei in preparation of clinical application.
Miyatake A; Nishio T; Ogino T
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5818-29. PubMed ID: 21992396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography.
Schulte RW; Penfold SN; Tafas JT; Schubert KE
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4849-56. PubMed ID: 19070218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
