These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520759)

  • 1. Sensitivity estimation in time-of-flight list-mode positron emission tomography.
    Herraiz JL; Sitek A
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6690-702. PubMed ID: 26520759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data?
    Conti M
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 21119224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.
    Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel scatter compensation of list-mode PET data using spatial and energy dependent corrections.
    Guérin B; El Fakhri G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):759-73. PubMed ID: 21118770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compton scatter tomography in TOF-PET.
    Hemmati H; Kamali-Asl A; Ay M; Ghafarian P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7641-7658. PubMed ID: 28749378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery and normalization of triple coincidences in PET.
    Lage E; Parot V; Moore SC; Sitek A; Udías JM; Dave SR; Park MA; Vaquero JJ; Herraiz JL
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1398-410. PubMed ID: 25735294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation of triple coincidences in PET.
    Cal-González J; Lage E; Herranz E; Vicente E; Udias JM; Moore SC; Park MA; Dave SR; Parot V; Herraiz JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):117-36. PubMed ID: 25479147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full modelling of the MOSAIC animal PET system based on the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code.
    Merheb C; Petegnief Y; Talbot JN
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):563-76. PubMed ID: 17228105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
    Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
    Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.
    Karp JS; Surti S; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Muehllehner G
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Mar; 49(3):462-70. PubMed ID: 18287269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulations of the count rate performance of a clinical whole-body MR/PET scanner.
    Delso G; Martinez MJ; Torres I; Ladebeck R; Michel C; Nekolla S; Ziegler SI
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4126-35. PubMed ID: 19810486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovering the triple coincidence of non-pure positron emitters in preclinical PET.
    Lin HH; Chuang KS; Chen SY; Jan ML
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):1904-31. PubMed ID: 26878420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.
    Gatidis S; Würslin C; Seith F; Schäfer JF; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 26929936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NEMA NU 4-2008 validation and applications of the PET-SORTEO Monte Carlo simulations platform for the geometry of the Inveon PET preclinical scanner.
    Boisson F; Wimberley CJ; Lehnert W; Zahra D; Pham T; Perkins G; Hamze H; Gregoire MC; Reilhac A
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6749-63. PubMed ID: 24018840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
    Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully 3D list-mode time-of-flight PET image reconstruction on GPUs using CUDA.
    Cui JY; Pratx G; Prevrhal S; Levin CS
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6775-86. PubMed ID: 22149859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
    Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography.
    Habte F; Foudray AM; Olcott PD; Levin CS
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3753-72. PubMed ID: 17664575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A self-normalization reconstruction technique for PET scans using the positron emission data.
    Salomon A; Goldschmidt B; Botnar R; Kiessling F; Schulz V
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2234-40. PubMed ID: 22910096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.