415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520763)
21. Estimation of the binding potential BP
Schain M; Zanderigo F; Mann JJ; Ogden RT
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():121-131. PubMed ID: 27856316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development and evaluation of convergent and accelerated penalized SPECT image reconstruction methods for improved dose-volume histogram estimation in radiopharmaceutical therapy.
Cheng L; Hobbs RF; Sgouros G; Frey EC
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112507. PubMed ID: 25370666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simplifications in analyzing positron emission tomography data: effects on outcome measures.
Logan J; Alexoff D; Kriplani A
Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 34(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 17921027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image derived input functions for dynamic High Resolution Research Tomograph PET brain studies.
Mourik JE; van Velden FH; Lubberink M; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Neuroimage; 2008 Dec; 43(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 18707007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of scatter correction on D2 receptor occupancy measurements using 123I-IBZM SPECT: comparison to 11C-Raclopride PET.
Bullich S; Cot A; Gallego J; Gunn RN; Suárez M; Pavía J; Ros D; Laruelle M; Catafau AM
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1511-8. PubMed ID: 20083205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image-derived input function for human brain using high resolution PET imaging with [C](R)-rolipram and [C]PBR28.
Zanotti-Fregonara P; Liow JS; Fujita M; Dusch E; Zoghbi SS; Luong E; Boellaard R; Pike VW; Comtat C; Innis RB
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17056. PubMed ID: 21364880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An improved ordered subsets expectation maximization positron emission computerized tomography reconstruction.
Chen H; Lei X; Yao D
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1780-5. PubMed ID: 17624322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigation of dynamic SPECT measurements of the arterial input function in human subjects using simulation, phantom and human studies.
Winant CD; Aparici CM; Zelnik YR; Reutter BW; Sitek A; Bacharach SL; Gullberg GT
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 57(2):375-93. PubMed ID: 22170801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by PET: importance of dual-input blood sampling.
Munk OL; Bass L; Roelsgaard K; Bender D; Hansen SB; Keiding S
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 11337579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 3 methods of automated internal carotid segmentation in human brain PET studies: application to the estimation of arterial input function.
Zanotti-Fregonara P; Maroy R; Comtat C; Jan S; Gaura V; Bar-Hen A; Ribeiro MJ; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Mar; 50(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 19223421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of 18F-fluorocholine kinetics in patients with prostate cancer.
Verwer EE; Oprea-Lager DE; van den Eertwegh AJ; van Moorselaar RJ; Windhorst AD; Schwarte LA; Hendrikse NH; Schuit RC; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 25678491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
Huet P; Burg S; Le Guludec D; Hyafil F; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 25722452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An improved optimization algorithm of the three-compartment model with spillover and partial volume corrections for dynamic FDG PET images of small animal hearts in vivo.
Li Y; Kundu BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(5):055003. PubMed ID: 29480159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study.
Oda K; Toyama H; Uemura K; Ikoma Y; Kimura Y; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.
Häggström I; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Larsson A
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111907. PubMed ID: 25370640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Pharmacokinetics: Classical Blood Sampling Versus Image-Derived Analysis of [18F]FAZA and [18F]FDG in a Murine Tumor Bearing Model.
Jans HS; Yang XH; Brocks DR; Kumar P; Wuest M; Wiebe LI
J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2018; 21(1s):32s-47s. PubMed ID: 29702045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantification of 11C-Laniquidar Kinetics in the Brain.
Froklage FE; Boellaard R; Bakker E; Hendrikse NH; Reijneveld JC; Schuit RC; Windhorst AD; Schober P; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Postnov A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1730-5. PubMed ID: 26294297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Population-based input function and image-derived input function for [¹¹C](R)-rolipram PET imaging: methodology, validation and application to the study of major depressive disorder.
Zanotti-Fregonara P; Hines CS; Zoghbi SS; Liow JS; Zhang Y; Pike VW; Drevets WC; Mallinger AG; Zarate CA; Fujita M; Innis RB
Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1532-41. PubMed ID: 22906792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
