These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26520874)

  • 1. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; Gazi P; Prionas ND; Nosratieh A; Li CS; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 26520874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; López JE; Hernandez AM; Gazi P; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
    Br J Radiol; 2019 May; 92(1097):20181034. PubMed ID: 30810339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.
    Prionas ND; Lindfors KK; Ray S; Huang SY; Beckett LA; Monsky WL; Boone JM
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):714-23. PubMed ID: 20720067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Growth Dynamics of Mammographic Calcifications: Differentiating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from Benign Breast Disease.
    Grimm LJ; Miller MM; Thomas SM; Liu Y; Lo JY; Hwang ES; Hyslop T; Ryser MD
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31112087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
    Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.
    Jansen SA; Newstead GM; Abe H; Shimauchi A; Schmidt RA; Karczmar GS
    Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 18024450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease: Radiologists's Predictive Performance.
    Selvakumaran V; Hou R; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Lu LX; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hwang ES; Lo JY; Grimm LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1580-1585. PubMed ID: 32001164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
    Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ploumen RAW; de Mooij CM; Gommers S; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5423-5435. PubMed ID: 37020070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
    Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
    Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed-Methods Study to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease on Mammography.
    Grimm LJ; Neely B; Hou R; Selvakumaran V; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hyslop T; Hwang ES; Lo JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):903-911. PubMed ID: 32783550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.
    Zhang M; Lin Q; Su XH; Cui CX; Bian TT; Wang CQ; Zhao J; Li LL; Ma JZ; Huang JL
    Clin Radiol; 2021 Oct; 76(10):787.e1-787.e7. PubMed ID: 34052010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score.
    Woodard GA; Price ER
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up.
    Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Auweter SD; Liebhardt S; Mayr D; Willner M; Hahn D; Zanette I; Weitkamp T; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F; Reiser MF; Bamberg F
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 22932738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
    Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic features of calcifications in DCIS: correlation with oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.
    Bae MS; Moon WK; Chang JM; Cho N; Park SY; Won JK; Jeon YK; Moon HG; Han W; Park IA
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2072-8. PubMed ID: 23512196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
    Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.