BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26521114)

  • 1. Analysis of National Drug Code Identifiers in Ambulatory E-Prescribing.
    Dhavle AA; Ward-Charlerie S; Rupp MT; Amin VP; Ruiz J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Nov; 21(11):1025-31. PubMed ID: 26521114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the implementation of RxNorm in ambulatory electronic prescriptions.
    Dhavle AA; Ward-Charlerie S; Rupp MT; Kilbourne J; Amin VP; Ruiz J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e99-e107. PubMed ID: 26510879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice.
    Dhavle AA; Yang Y; Rupp MT; Singh H; Ward-Charlerie S; Ruiz J
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 176(4):463-70. PubMed ID: 26954486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and Variability of Patient Directions in Electronic Prescriptions in the Ambulatory Care Setting.
    Yang Y; Ward-Charlerie S; Dhavle AA; Rupp MT; Green J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jul; 24(7):691-699. PubMed ID: 29345553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting Potential Medication Selection Errors During Outpatient Pharmacy Processing of Electronic Prescriptions With the RxNorm Application Programming Interface: Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.
    Lester CA; Tu L; Ding Y; Flynn AJ
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16073. PubMed ID: 32044760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of RxNorm in Ambulatory Electronic Prescribing.
    Bell DS; O'Neill SM; Reynolds K; Schoeff D
    Rand Health Q; 2011; 1(3):8. PubMed ID: 28083195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the variability of ingredient, strength, and dose form information from electronic prescriptions with RxNorm drug product descriptions.
    Lester CA; Flynn AJ; Marshall VD; Rochowiak S; Rowell B; Bagian JP
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Aug; 29(9):1471-1479. PubMed ID: 35773948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing automated product selection success rates in transmissions between electronic prescribing and community pharmacy platforms.
    Panich J; Larson N; Sojka L; Wallace Z; Lokken J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jan; 28(1):113-118. PubMed ID: 33186450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From physician intent to the pharmacy label: prevalence and description of discrepancies from a cross-sectional evaluation of electronic prescriptions.
    Cochran GL; Klepser DG; Morien M; Lomelin D; Schainost R; Lander L
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Mar; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 24106311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twelve-month drug cost savings related to use of an electronic prescribing system with integrated decision support in primary care.
    McMullin ST; Lonergan TP; Rynearson CS
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 May; 11(4):322-32. PubMed ID: 15871643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a wireless handheld medication management device in the prevention of drug-drug interactions in a Medicaid population.
    Malone DC; Saverno KR
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2012; 18(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 22235953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of community chain pharmacists' interventions on electronic prescriptions.
    Warholak TL; Rupp MT
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2009; 49(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19196598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the NCPDP Structured and Codified Sig Format for e-prescriptions.
    Liu H; Burkhart Q; Bell DS
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 21613642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis.
    Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Dorsch MP; Ding Y; Vydiswaran VGV; Lester CA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2021 Apr; 30(4):311-319. PubMed ID: 32451350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards creating the perfect electronic prescription.
    Dhavle AA; Rupp MT
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e7-e12. PubMed ID: 25038197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study.
    Weingart SN; Massagli M; Cyrulik A; Isaac T; Morway L; Sands DZ; Weissman JS
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 19395307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between e-prescriptions and community pharmacy workflow.
    Odukoya OK; Chui MA
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2012; 52(6):e168-74. PubMed ID: 23229979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication failure: analysis of prescribers' use of an internal free-text field on electronic prescriptions.
    Ai A; Wong A; Amato M; Wright A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jun; 25(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 29474659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of the Prescriber Information in the Danish National Prescription Registry.
    Rasmussen L; Valentin J; Gesser KM; Hallas J; Pottegård A
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2016 Oct; 119(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 27098169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.