These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26521500)

  • 1. Psychometric Testing of a Simulation Rubric for Measuring Interprofessional Communication.
    Reising DL; Carr DE; Tieman S; Feather R; Ozdogan Z
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 26521500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.
    Paige JT; Garbee DD; Kozmenko V; Yu Q; Kozmenko L; Yang T; Bonanno L; Swartz W
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Jan; 218(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 24183570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of communication outcomes in traditional versus simulation strategies in nursing and medical students.
    Reising DL; Carr DE; Shea RA; King JM
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2011; 32(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 22029245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method and resources for assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments.
    Adamson KA; Kardong-Edgren S
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2012; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 23061193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.
    Levett-Jones T; McCoy M; Lapkin S; Noble D; Hoffman K; Dempsey J; Arthur C; Roche J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2011 Oct; 31(7):705-10. PubMed ID: 21288606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students.
    Gantt LT
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 20455367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updating the Simulation Effectiveness Tool: Item Modifications and Reevaluation of Psychometric Properties.
    Leighton K; Ravert P; Mudra V; Macintosh C
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 26521501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning together: Using simulations to develop nursing and medical student collaboration.
    Reese CE; Jeffries PR; Engum SA
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20397478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.
    Vreugdenhil J; Spek B
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Mar; 62():43-51. PubMed ID: 29289636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and internal consistency findings from the C-SEI.
    Adamson KA; Parsons ME; Hawkins K; Manz JA; Todd M; Hercinger M
    J Nurs Educ; 2011 Oct; 50(10):583-6. PubMed ID: 21751763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.
    Gu YH; Xiong L; Bai JB; Hu J; Tan XD
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Dec; 71():121-128. PubMed ID: 30286369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulations in nursing education.
    Todd M; Manz JA; Hawkins KS; Parsons ME; Hercinger M
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2008; 5():Article 41. PubMed ID: 19049492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation evaluation using a modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric.
    Ashcraft AS; Opton L; Bridges RA; Caballero S; Veesart A; Weaver C
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2013; 34(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 23763027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the simulation learning effectiveness inventory.
    Bates TA; Clark PC
    J Prof Nurs; 2019; 35(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 31857056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a simulation evaluation tool for assessing nursing students' clinical judgment in caring for children with dehydration.
    Kim SJ; Kim S; Kang KA; Oh J; Lee MN
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Feb; 37():45-52. PubMed ID: 26652125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: a validation study.
    Shin H; Park CG; Shim K
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jan; 35(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 25034956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring students perceptions of interprofessional clinical placements: development of the Interprofessional Clinical Placement Learning Environment Inventory.
    Anderson A; Cant R; Hood K
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2014 Sep; 14(5):518-24. PubMed ID: 25065709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nursing and medical student attitudes about communication and collaboration before and after an interprofessional education experience.
    Delunas LR; Rouse S
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2014; 35(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 24783725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.