These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26521647)

  • 21. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Context-Aware Reviewer Assignment for Trust Enhanced Peer Review.
    Li L; Wang Y; Liu G; Wang M; Wu X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130493. PubMed ID: 26090849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting on interventions: issues and guidelines for rehabilitation researchers.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 96(6):1170-80. PubMed ID: 25660003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122328. PubMed ID: 25793517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.
    Oehrlein EM; Graff JS; Perfetto EM; Mullins CD; Dubois RW; Anyanwu C; Onukwugha E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 29415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urologic Literature.
    Narayan VM; Cone EB; Smith D; Scales CD; Dahm P
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):1044-1049. PubMed ID: 27503840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts: survey of leading general dental journals.
    Hua F; Deng L; Kau CH; Jiang H; He H; Walsh T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 146(9):669-678.e1. PubMed ID: 26314976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A standard method for reporting ramdomized medical scientific research; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 May; 142(19):1089-91. PubMed ID: 9623225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better?
    Balasubramanian SP; Wiener M; Alshameeri Z; Tiruvoipati R; Elbourne D; Reed MW
    Ann Surg; 2006 Nov; 244(5):663-7. PubMed ID: 17060756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Moher D
    BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():274. PubMed ID: 26521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.
    Milette K; Roseman M; Thombs BD
    J Psychosom Res; 2011 Mar; 70(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 21334491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
    Igi R
    J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.
    Tate RL; Perdices M; Rosenkoetter U; Shadish W; Vohra S; Barlow DH; Horner R; Kazdin A; Kratochwill T; McDonald S; Sampson M; Shamseer L; Togher L; Albin R; Backman C; Douglas J; Evans JJ; Gast D; Manolov R; Mitchell G; Nickels L; Nikles J; Ownsworth T; Rose M; Schmid CH; Wilson B
    Phys Ther; 2016 Jul; 96(7):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27371692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimizing the three stages of publication bias.
    Chalmers TC; Frank CS; Reitman D
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1392-5. PubMed ID: 2406473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?
    Ferreira C; Bastille-Rousseau G; Bennett AM; Ellington EH; Terwissen C; Austin C; Borlestean A; Boudreau MR; Chan K; Forsythe A; Hossie TJ; Landolt K; Longhi J; Otis JA; Peers MJ; Rae J; Seguin J; Watt C; Wehtje M; Murray DL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Aug; 91(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 25865035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to review a paper.
    Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2003 Dec; 27(1-4):47-52. PubMed ID: 12760840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.