These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26521687)

  • 21. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Tosto S; Chiesa F; Martinoli C; Derchi LE; Calabrese M
    Breast; 2009 Feb; 18(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19010678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
    Lee J; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.
    Fowler EE; Sellers TA; Lu B; Heine JJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113502. PubMed ID: 24320473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Seo JM; Ko ES; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jul; 68(7):690-5. PubMed ID: 23434202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
    Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jul; 65(7):708-715. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
    Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
    Destounis S; Johnston L; Highnam R; Arieno A; Morgan R; Chan A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 27824483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
    Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
    Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
    Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.