These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26521969)

  • 21. Online Reviews of Specialized Drug Treatment Facilities-Identifying Potential Drivers of High and Low Patient Satisfaction.
    Agarwal AK; Wong V; Pelullo AM; Guntuku S; Polsky D; Asch DA; Muruako J; Merchant RM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1647-1653. PubMed ID: 31755009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What Patients Think About Their Interventional Radiologists: Assessment Using a Leading Physician Ratings Website.
    Obele CC; Duszak R; Hawkins CM; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 May; 14(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 28017529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Schlesinger M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 29402321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving patient satisfaction through information provision.
    Billing K; Newland H; Selva D
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 35(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 17651249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality of outpatient health services.
    Peyrot M; Cooper PD; Schnapf D
    J Health Care Mark; 1993; 13(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10126027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills.
    Wood J; Collins J; Burnside ES; Albanese MA; Propeck PA; Kelcz F; Spilde JM; Schmaltz LM
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):931-9. PubMed ID: 15288041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Radiologist Will See You Now: Patients' Perceptions of an Outpatient Interventional Clinic.
    Abboud S; Partovi S; Nakamoto D; Azar N
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 26596560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.
    Chua JT; Nguyen E; Risbud A; Soltanzadeh-Zarandi S; Lee A; Jamshidi S; Bayginejad S; Abouzari M
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct; 131(10):2356-2360. PubMed ID: 33625763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Online Reviews as Health Data: Examining the Association Between Availability of Health Care Services and Patient Star Ratings Exemplified by the Yelp Academic Dataset.
    Tran NN; Lee J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2017 Jul; 3(3):e43. PubMed ID: 28701293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of a PACS Embedded System for Communicating Radiologist to Technologist Learning Opportunities and Patient Callbacks.
    Glazer DI; Zhao AH; Lacson R; Burk KS; DiPiro PJ; Kapoor N; Khorasani R
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2022; 51(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 34836721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons.
    Mark EJ; Driskill EK; Fisher CT; Swinehart SV; Bradford PS; Jones M; DeGeorge BR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):463-471. PubMed ID: 36780357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting.
    Tomlinson D; Stapleman K
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social Media Presence Correlated with Improved Online Review Scores for Spine Surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Pastore MA; Sama AJ; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Bondar KJ; Shenoy K; Spielman AF; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 141():e18-e25. PubMed ID: 32311565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the potential versus the actual earnings of academic radiologists: effects of unequal duty service assignments.
    Davis PL
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):782-91. PubMed ID: 11508759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic technologist job satisfaction: what radiologists need to know--results of a large national survey.
    Collins J; Prue LK; Leahy-Gross KM; Fuglestad SL
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 9577497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.