298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26522112)
21. Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: Do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?
Boynukalin FK; Turgut NE; Gultomruk M; Ecemis S; Yarkiner Z; Findikli N; Bahceci M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234481. PubMed ID: 32589634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles.
Du QY; Wang EY; Huang Y; Guo XY; Xiong YJ; Yu YP; Yao GD; Shi SL; Sun YP
Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):910-919.e1. PubMed ID: 26776910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Infertility treatment strategy involving combined freeze-all embryos and single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer during hormonal replacement cycle for in vitro fertilization of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
Kuroda K; Ezoe K; Kato K; Yabuuchi A; Segawa T; Kobayashi T; Ochiai A; Katoh N; Takeda S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 May; 44(5):922-928. PubMed ID: 29436143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women.
Polyzos NP; Drakopoulos P; Parra J; Pellicer A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Tournaye H; Bosch E; Garcia-Velasco J
Fertil Steril; 2018 Sep; 110(4):661-670.e1. PubMed ID: 30196963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are perinatal outcomes affected by blastocyst vitrification and warming?
Barsky M; St Marie P; Rahil T; Markenson GR; Sites CK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):603.e1-603.e5. PubMed ID: 27287684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The combined impact of maternal age and body mass index on cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization.
Goldman RH; Farland LV; Thomas AM; Zera CA; Ginsburg ES
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):617.e1-617.e13. PubMed ID: 31163133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fresh
Le TMC; Ong PT; Nguyen QA; Roque M
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2022 Aug; 26(3):450-459. PubMed ID: 35191632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos?
Kaartinen N; Das P; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Tinkanen H
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar; 30(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 25596905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Time-lapse monitoring of zona pellucida-free embryos obtained through in vitro fertilization: a retrospective case series.
Bodri D; Kato R; Kondo M; Hosomi N; Katsumata Y; Kawachiya S; Matsumoto T
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):e35. PubMed ID: 25772774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer.
Feng G; Zhang B; Zhou H; Shu J; Gan X; Wu F; Deng X
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 22995746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years.
Chang CC; Elliott TA; Wright G; Shapiro DB; Toledo AA; Nagy ZP
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1891-7. PubMed ID: 23481277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Egg donation of vitrified oocytes bank produces similar pregnancy rates by blastocyst transfer when compared to fresh cycle.
Domingues TS; Aquino AP; Barros B; Mazetto R; Nicolielo M; Kimati CM; Devecchi T; Bonetti TCS; Serafini PC; Motta ELA
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Nov; 34(11):1553-1557. PubMed ID: 28815355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 'Two countries-two labs': the transnational gamete donation (TGD) programme to support egg donation.
Coccia ME; Rizzello F; Wakunga S; Badolato L; Evangelisti P; Bertocci F; Giachini C; Criscuoli L; Micelli E; Picone R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Dec; 37(12):3039-3049. PubMed ID: 33047185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery.
Sekhon L; Lee JA; Flisser E; Copperman AB; Stein D
Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Jul; 37(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29706285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.
Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts.
Hodes-Wertz B; Noyes N; Mullin C; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Jul; 23(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 21550305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
