These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26522621)

  • 21. An EMG-driven model applied for predicting metabolic energy consumption during movement.
    Bisi MC; Stagni R; Houdijk H; Gnudi G
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Dec; 21(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 21840224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of muscle forces in gait using a simulation of the electromyographic activity and numerical optimization.
    Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Braidot AA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25408069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.
    Heintz S; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17071088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Which data should be tracked in forward-dynamic optimisation to best predict muscle forces in a pathological co-contraction case?
    Bélaise C; Michaud B; Dal Maso F; Mombaur K; Begon M
    J Biomech; 2018 Feb; 68():99-106. PubMed ID: 29325902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model.
    Cholewicki J; McGill SM
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1287-9. PubMed ID: 7962016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a novel MATLAB-based framework for implementing mechanical joint stability constraints within OpenSim musculoskeletal models.
    Akhavanfar MH; Brandon SCE; Brown SHM; Graham RB
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():61-68. PubMed ID: 31138478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EMG-Informed Neuromusculoskeletal Models Accurately Predict Knee Loading Measured Using Instrumented Implants.
    Bennett KJ; Pizzolato C; Martelli S; Bahl JS; Sivakumar A; Atkins GJ; Solomon LB; Thewlis D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 69(7):2268-2275. PubMed ID: 34990350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of different methods for estimating muscle forces in human movement.
    Lin YC; Dorn TW; Schache AG; Pandy MG
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 22468462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EMG-Driven Optimal Estimation of Subject-SPECIFIC Hill Model Muscle-Tendon Parameters of the Knee Joint Actuators.
    Falisse A; Van Rossom S; Jonkers I; De Groote F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 64(9):2253-2262. PubMed ID: 27875132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modelling, simulation and optimisation of a human vertical jump.
    Spägele T; Kistner A; Gollhofer A
    J Biomech; 1999 May; 32(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 10327006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A neuromusculoskeletal model of the human lower limb: towards EMG-driven actuation of multiple joints in powered orthoses.
    Sartori M; Reggiani M; Lloyd DG; Pagello E
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975441. PubMed ID: 22275641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Antagonistic activity of one-joint muscles in three-dimensions using non-linear optimisation.
    Jinha A; Ait-Haddou R; Binding P; Herzog W
    Math Biosci; 2006 Jul; 202(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16697422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of EMG processing on biomechanical models of muscle joint systems: sensitivity of trunk muscle moments, spinal forces, and stability.
    Staudenmann D; Potvin JR; Kingma I; Stegeman DF; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 16765965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EMG-driven musculoskeletal model calibration with estimation of unmeasured muscle excitations
    Ao D; Vega MM; Shourijeh MS; Patten C; Fregly BJ
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():962959. PubMed ID: 36159690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?
    Valente G; Pitto L; Testi D; Seth A; Delp SL; Stagni R; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112625. PubMed ID: 25390896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An EMG-to-force processing approach for determining ankle muscle forces during normal human gait.
    Bogey RA; Perry J; Gitter AJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 16200754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Calibration of EMG to force for knee muscles is applicable with submaximal voluntary contractions.
    Doorenbosch CA; Joosten A; Harlaar J
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 15811613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An EMG-driven model of the upper extremity and estimation of long head biceps force.
    Langenderfer J; LaScalza S; Mell A; Carpenter JE; Kuhn JE; Hughes RE
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Jan; 35(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 15567350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictions of co-contraction depend critically on degrees-of-freedom in the musculoskeletal model.
    Jinha A; Ait-Haddou R; Herzog W
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 16549102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.