These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26522690)

  • 1. A sequential classification rule based on multiple quantitative tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhang J; Zhang Y; Chaloner K; Stapleton JT
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1359-72. PubMed ID: 26522690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.
    Xu H; Black MA; Craig BA
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2571-84. PubMed ID: 23212851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.
    Cai T; Cheng S
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 18056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-inferiority and superiority tests for partially matched data when a constraint is placed on the number of new tests.
    van de Ven PM; Berkhof J
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2515-28. PubMed ID: 23203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new likelihood approach to inference about predictive values of diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Tsou TS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):541-548. PubMed ID: 27114327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach to model the conditional correlation between several diagnostic tests and various replicated subjects measurements.
    Pereira da Silva HD; Ascaso C; Gonçalves AQ; Orlandi PP; Abellana R
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3154-3170. PubMed ID: 28543307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal combination of biomarkers for time-dependent receiver operating characteristic estimation and related problems.
    Guan Z; Qin J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):898-913. PubMed ID: 25432691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian analysis and classification of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests without a gold standard.
    Zhang J; Chaloner K; McLinden JH; Stapleton JT
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):4102-17. PubMed ID: 23592433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and cut-off point selection in three-class classification problems using a generalization of the Youden index.
    Nakas CT; Alonzo TA; Yiannoutsos CT
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2946-55. PubMed ID: 20809485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
    Spencer BD
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Drew C; Badio M; Dennis D; Hensley L; Higgs E; Sneller M; Fallah M; Reilly C
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1546-1558. PubMed ID: 35531799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approximate confidence intervals for the likelihood ratios of a binary diagnostic test in the presence of partial disease verification.
    Montero-Alonso MA; Roldán-Nofuentes JA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):56-81. PubMed ID: 29584541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using extended Rasch models to assess validity of diagnostic tests in the presence of a reference standard.
    Viallon V; Ecosse E; Mesbah M; Pouchot J; Coste J
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):376-93. PubMed ID: 23270981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Ning J; Nie L; Zhu H; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):914-930. PubMed ID: 25512146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
    Qin J; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.