271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26522755)
1. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays.
Huh HJ; Chung JW; Park SY; Chae SL
Ann Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 36(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 26522755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of positive results in mediace rapid plasma reagin and Treponema pallidum latex agglutination as the automated syphilis test].
Huh HJ; Lee KK; Kim ES; Chae SL
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Oct; 27(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 18094596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategy for performing treponemal tests in reverse-sequence algorithms of syphilis diagnosis.
Yi J; Choi W; Shin S; Choi J; Kim H; Chung HJ; Moon HW; Hur M; Yun YM
Clin Biochem; 2019 Jan; 63():121-125. PubMed ID: 30287231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups.
Nah EH; Cho S; Kim S; Cho HI; Chai JY
Ann Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 37(6):511-515. PubMed ID: 28840989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of new algorithm using TPLA as an initial syphilis screening test.
Murai R; Yamada K; Yonezawa H; Yanagihara N; Takahashi S
J Infect Chemother; 2019 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 30054230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of performance and false positivity of Mediace RPR test that uses a chemistry autoanalyzer].
Noh J; Ko HH; Yun Y; Choi YS; Lee SG; Shin S; Han KS; Song EY
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 18728382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing.
Lee JH; Lim CS; Lee MG; Kim HS
BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005664. PubMed ID: 25552608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of quantitative results among two automated Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) assays and a manual RPR test].
Kim YS; Lee J; Lee HK; Kim H; Kwon HJ; Min KO; Seo EJ; Kim SY
Korean J Lab Med; 2009 Aug; 29(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 19726896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
Rourk AR; Litwin CM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22878. PubMed ID: 30861169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of Automated Latex Turbidimetric Rapid Plasma Reagin Test for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Treatment Response in Syphilis in Comparison with Manual Card Test: a Prospective Cohort Study.
Tsuboi M; Nishijima T; Aoki T; Teruya K; Kikuchi Y; Gatanaga H; Oka S
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 30135229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis.
Lee S; Yu HJ; Lim S; Park H; Kwon MJ; Woo HY
Int J Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 80():98-104. PubMed ID: 30634041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total With Automated Rapid Plasma Reagin: Experience From a Tertiary Medical Center.
Tang EW; Paiva KJ; Pytel-Parenteau DL; Maynard MA; Chan PA; Lu S
Sex Transm Dis; 2020 May; 47(5):301-305. PubMed ID: 32073549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance Characteristics of the Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm in a Population With a Moderately High Prevalence of Syphilis.
Rourk AR; Nolte FS; Litwin CM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Nov; 146(5):572-577. PubMed ID: 27773873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, Captia Syphilis-G, and SpiroTek Reagin II tests with standard test techniques for diagnosis of syphilis.
Pope V; Fears MB; Morrill WE; Castro A; Kikkert SE
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 38(7):2543-5. PubMed ID: 10878040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay.
Arbefeville S; Lynch M; Ferrieri P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jul; 152(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31139835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of a fully automated RPR assay (Mediace RPR) for serological diagnosis and follow-up of syphilis: a retrospective study.
Leroy AG; Robert M; Carpentier M; Bastidon C; Gautreau B; Lefebvre M; Bonnet B; Bernier C; Corvec S; Guillouzouic A
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Nov; 104(3):115767. PubMed ID: 36049344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding Utilization and Seroprevalence of Syphilis Tests in Local Clinics and Hospitals in Korea.
Choi R; Lee SG; Lee EH
Clin Lab; 2023 Jan; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 36649527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the performance of traditional non-treponemal tests on syphilis and non-syphilis serum samples.
Gu WM; Yang Y; Wang QZ; Pan BS; Guo W; Wu L; Hu WZ; Yang S; Song BB; Zhang CY
Int J STD AIDS; 2013 Dec; 24(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 23970626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
