183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26523138)
1. Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.
Ramezanali F; Afkhami F; Soleimani A; Kharrazifard MJ; Rafiee F
Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 26523138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
Azar MR; Mokhtare M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars.
Nazari Moghaddam K; Mehran M; Farajian Zadeh H
Iran Endod J; 2009; 4(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23940486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth.
Azar MR; Safi L; Nikaein A
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Mar; 9(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22623929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time between Rotary and Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
Katge F; Chimata VK; Poojari M; Shetty S; Rusawat B
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 27365932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars.
Ramazani N; Mohammadi A; Amirabadi F; Ramazani M; Ehsani F
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2016; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27092215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study.
Mehlawat R; Kapoor R; Gandhi K; Kumar D; Malhotra R; Ahuja S
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2019; 9(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 30963021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed Tomographic Assessment of Remaining Dentin and Risk of Perforation after Kedo-S and Mtwo Rotary Instrumentation in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: An
Swaminathan K; Rakkesh KM; Haridoss S
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S87-S91. PubMed ID: 35645498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
Kalita S; Agarwal N; Jabin Z; Anand A
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):383-387. PubMed ID: 34720511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Priyadarshini P; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian EMG
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 32185634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study.
Bhatti N; Sroa R; Sikri VK
Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Apr; 1(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 22114390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals.
Krishna DRM; Setty JV; Srinivasan I; Melwani A
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 31939368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.
Musale PK; Mujawar SA
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Apr; 15(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 23893606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of root canal cleaning efficacy of selfadjusting files, protaper rotary, and manual K-Files in primary teeth - An
Challagulla A; Chandrappa V; Akurathi R; N Mrudula KJ; Vemagiri CT; Thote K
Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(1):65-68. PubMed ID: 37417060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.
Divya S; Jeevanandan G; Sujatha S; Subramanian EMG; Ravindran V
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):904-908. PubMed ID: 31939369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex Vivo Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary File Systems in Root Canal Deviation: One File Only versus the Conventional Method.
Aminsobhani M; Razmi H; Nozari S
J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jul; 12(7):469-77. PubMed ID: 26877736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of working length control consistency between hand K-files and Mtwo NiTi rotary system.
Krajczár K; Varga E; Marada G; Jeges S; Tóth V
J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Apr; 8(2):e136-40. PubMed ID: 27034752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
