These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26523560)

  • 21. Comparison of different validation methods for single-step genomic evaluations based on a simulated cattle population.
    Himmelbauer J; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst C; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Dec; 106(12):9026-9043. PubMed ID: 37641303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technical note: Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):2027-2031. PubMed ID: 33309381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
    Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.
    Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 36637041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.
    Jibrila I; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):48. PubMed ID: 35764921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population.
    Song H; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Gao H; Tang S; Mi S; Yu F; Meng Q; Xiao W; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3415-3424. PubMed ID: 28805914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Bradford HL; Chen CY; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3391-3395. PubMed ID: 28805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of genomic evaluation with weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction for milk production traits, udder type traits, and somatic cell scores in French dairy goats.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granie C
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3142-3154. PubMed ID: 30712939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using residual regressions to quantify and map signal leakage in genomic prediction.
    Valente BD; de Los Campos G; Grueneberg A; Chen CY; Ros-Freixedes R; Herring WO
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Aug; 55(1):57. PubMed ID: 37550618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.
    Yin C; Zhou P; Wang Y; Yin Z; Liu Y
    Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101062. PubMed ID: 38211414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.