These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26523560)
41. Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data. Koivula M; Strandén I; Pösö J; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2775-84. PubMed ID: 25660739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders. van Grevenhof EM; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 30423111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins. Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prediction of genomic breeding values for reproductive traits in Nellore heifers. Costa RB; Irano N; Diaz IDPS; Takada L; Hermisdorff IDC; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; de Oliveira HN; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG Theriogenology; 2019 Feb; 125():12-17. PubMed ID: 30368127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach. Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Resistance Against Yoshida GM; Bangera R; Carvalheiro R; Correa K; Figueroa R; Lhorente JP; Yáñez JM G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Feb; 8(2):719-726. PubMed ID: 29255117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Accuracy of genomic prediction for growth and carcass traits in Chinese triple-yellow chickens. Liu T; Qu H; Luo C; Shu D; Wang J; Lund MS; Su G BMC Genet; 2014 Oct; 15():110. PubMed ID: 25316160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Alternative methods improve the accuracy of genomic prediction using information from a causal point mutation in a dairy sheep model. Oget C; Teissier M; Astruc JM; Tosser-Klopp G; Rupp R BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):719. PubMed ID: 31533617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study. Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle. Park MN; Alam M; Kim S; Park B; Lee SH; Lee SS Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 33(10):1544-1557. PubMed ID: 32054201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. First Genomic Prediction of Single-Step Models in Large Yellow Croaker. Wang J; Bai Y; Zou X; Li C; Yang J; Ke Q; Zhao J; Zhou T; Xu P Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2023 Aug; 25(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 37410311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes. Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Bradford HL; Menezes IR; Ferraz JBS; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 28833593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP. Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus. Imai A; Kuniga T; Yoshioka T; Nonaka K; Mitani N; Fukamachi H; Hiehata N; Yamamoto M; Hayashi T PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221880. PubMed ID: 31465502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits. Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction. Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Single step genomic evaluation for female fertility in Nordic Red dairy cattle. Matilainen K; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Oct; 135(5):337-348. PubMed ID: 30112802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]