These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26523560)

  • 61. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.
    Hollifield MK; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Howard JT; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33733277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.
    Lourenco D; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Misztal I
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 32674271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes.
    Wang H; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Muir WM
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Apr; 94(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 22624567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Genomic prediction in a nuclear population of layers using single-step models.
    Yan Y; Wu G; Liu A; Sun C; Han W; Li G; Yang N
    Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 97(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 29140467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.
    Vandenplas J; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(6):2060-2073. PubMed ID: 29873759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
    Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.
    Nilforooshan MA; Lee M
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1090-1100. PubMed ID: 30624671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
    Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.
    Legarra A; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4629-45. PubMed ID: 22818478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens.
    Chen CY; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Meuwissen TH; Aggrey SE; Wing T; Muir WM
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20889689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.