167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26523691)
1. Age equivalence in auditory distraction by changing and deviant speech sounds.
Röer JP; Bell R; Marsh JE; Buchner A
Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):849-55. PubMed ID: 26523691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.
Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():41-58. PubMed ID: 29574236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.
Marois A; Marsh JE; Vachon F
Biol Psychol; 2019 Feb; 141():64-74. PubMed ID: 30633950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction.
Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
Emotion; 2017 Jun; 17(4):740-750. PubMed ID: 28080086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance.
Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):160-173. PubMed ID: 34255305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
Hughes RW; Marsh JE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):427-442. PubMed ID: 31180705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.
Pacheco-Unguetti AP; Parmentier FB
Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 24098923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loud Auditory Distractors Are More Difficult to Ignore After All.
Alikadic L; Röer JP
Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):163-171. PubMed ID: 36255065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reassessing the token set size effect on serial recall: Implications for theories of auditory distraction.
Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 30265053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
Kattner F; Bryce D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.
Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10185. PubMed ID: 31308413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in Auditory Distraction between Adults and Children: A Duplex-mechanism Approach.
Joseph TN; Hughes RW; Sörqvist P; Marsh JE
J Cogn; 2018 Feb; 1(1):13. PubMed ID: 31517187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
Sörqvist P
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jul; 38(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 20551344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.
Hughes RW; Hurlstone MJ; Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 22731996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
