These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26524983)

  • 1. The temporal-relevance temporal-uncertainty model of prospective duration judgment.
    Zakay D
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 38():182-90. PubMed ID: 26524983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.
    Block RA; Hancock PA; Zakay D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):330-43. PubMed ID: 20403583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective duration judgments: the role of temporality and executive demands of concurrent tasks.
    Duzcu H; Hohenberger A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():34-41. PubMed ID: 24176728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time perception and temporal order memory.
    Brown SW; Smith-Petersen GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():173-80. PubMed ID: 24594383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.
    Binder M
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():432-47. PubMed ID: 25982561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review.
    Block RA; Gruber RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():129-33. PubMed ID: 24365036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Executive attentional resources in timing: Effects of inhibitory control and cognitive aging.
    Brown SW; Johnson TM; Sohl ME; Dumas MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1063-83. PubMed ID: 26010590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing and executive resources: dual-task interference patterns between temporal production and shifting, updating, and inhibition tasks.
    Brown SW; Collier SA; Night JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):947-63. PubMed ID: 23127475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time judgments as a function of clock duration: effects of temporal paradigm and an attention-demanding nontemporal task.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10485109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination and ordinal judgments of temporal durations at 3 months.
    Gava L; Valenza E; Di Bono MG; Tosatto C
    Infant Behav Dev; 2012 Dec; 35(4):751-60. PubMed ID: 22982276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involvement of shared resources in time judgment and sequence reasoning tasks.
    Brown SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():92-6. PubMed ID: 23680412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance.
    Klapproth F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 1):749-57. PubMed ID: 17688129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal predictability facilitates causal learning.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 21038987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Garner interference and temporal information processing.
    Zakay D; Bibi A; Algom D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():143-6. PubMed ID: 24054320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):13. PubMed ID: 27191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frozen in time: Concurrent task performance interferes with temporal shifts of attention.
    Visser TAW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 28263628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective.
    Zakay D; Block RA
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2004; 64(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 15283475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related differences in time-based prospective memory: The role of time estimation in the clock monitoring strategy.
    Vanneste S; Baudouin A; Bouazzaoui B; Taconnat L
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):812-25. PubMed ID: 26247302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of bias and uncertainty in a visual temporal individuation task.
    Martini P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 23143914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introducing a control condition in the classic oddball paradigm: Oddballs are overestimated in duration not only because of their oddness.
    Birngruber T; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1737-49. PubMed ID: 25832186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.