These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2652612)

  • 21. Fine needle aspiration biopsies of kidney allografts: results in 117 consecutive cases.
    Guiraudon C; Muirhead N; Hollomby D; Jevnikar AM
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Aug; 21(4):3593. PubMed ID: 2669253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of infiltrating lymphocytes from fine needle aspiration biopsies in kidney transplant patients by a rapid and sensitive immunomagnetic method.
    Pfeffer PF; Gjertsen HA; Gaudernack G; Lexow PB; Sodal G; Thorsby E
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Feb; 21(1 Pt 1):354-5. PubMed ID: 2495609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimized technique in needle biopsy protocol shown to be of greater sensitivity and accuracy compared to wedge biopsy.
    Yushkov Y; Dikman S; Alvarez-Casas J; Giudice A; Hoffman A; Goldstein MJ
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Sep; 42(7):2493-7. PubMed ID: 20832530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of renal transplant using fine needle aspiration biopsies with monoclonal antibodies.
    Mizuiri S; Ohara T; Aikawa A; Mitsuo K; Hasegawa A
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Jun; 21(3):3452-4. PubMed ID: 2662488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Serial biopsy controlled evaluation of fine needle aspiration in renal allograft rejection.
    Belitsky P; Campbell J; Gupta R
    Lab Invest; 1985 Nov; 53(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 3903346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of acute rejection in the course of renal transplant.
    Giacchino F; Segoloni GP; Rotunno M; Triolo G; Malfi B; Manzione A; Vercellone A
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Aug; 21(4):3605-6. PubMed ID: 2669259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Fine needle aspiration puncture and renal puncture biopsy as complementary methods in the monitoring of renal transplantation].
    Rodríguez SG; Verruno L; Samaniego MC; Martín R; Alvarez C; Aguirre C; Arrizurieta de Muchnik EE
    Medicina (B Aires); 1985; 45(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 3916017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in monitoring human renal transplant.
    Sirpal YM
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 38(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 9726150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety and risk stratification of percutaneous biopsies of adult-sized renal allografts in infant and older pediatric recipients.
    Vidhun J; Masciandro J; Varich L; Salvatierra O; Sarwal M
    Transplantation; 2003 Aug; 76(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 12923443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: an improved assessment of graft infiltration using image analysis.
    Foot RA; Fuggle SV; McWhinnie DL; Carter NP; Morris PJ
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Feb; 21(1 Pt 2):1905-6. PubMed ID: 2652621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differentiation of cyclosporine A-induced nephrotoxicity from acute rejection in renal transplantation using fine-needle aspiration biopsies.
    Zannier A; Mutin M; Touraine JL; Traeger J
    Transplant Proc; 1987 Oct; 19(5):3630-2. PubMed ID: 3313874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kidney glomeruli collected by fine needle aspiration biopsy.
    Miller S; Belitsky P; Gupta R
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Aug; 21(4):3614-7. PubMed ID: 2669262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Glomeruli in kidney transplants collected by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
    Miller SM; Belitsky P; Gupta R
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Aug; 20(4):584-5. PubMed ID: 3043805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. T cytotoxic/suppressor cells and T helper cells in fine needle renal allograft aspirates during different phases of rejection.
    Taube D; Hobby P; Welsh K
    Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc; 1983; 20():309-14. PubMed ID: 6228940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Percutaneous renal allograft biopsy. A comparison of two needle types and analysis of risk factors.
    Kolb LG; Velosa JA; Bergstralh EJ; Offord KP
    Transplantation; 1994 Jun; 57(12):1742-6. PubMed ID: 8016879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of urine cytology versus fine needle aspiration cytology in monitoring renal allograft dysfunction.
    Spohn B; Bauer H; Gmähle E; Guth R; Franz HE
    Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc; 1983; 19():495-9. PubMed ID: 6348750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Results of percutaneous biopsy of kidney transplants. Analysis of 200 successful puncture biopsies].
    Ditscherlein G; Schneider W; Guddat F; Höppchen R
    Z Urol Nephrol; 1986 Nov; 79(11):685-90. PubMed ID: 3551390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Diagnosis of graft rejection].
    Gonnermann D; Tenschert W; Cremaschi L
    Urologe A; 1994 Sep; 33(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 7974926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and tru-cut tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.
    Reeve RS; Cooksey G; Wenham PW; Bourne LD; Paterson AD; Blamey RW; Burden RP; Cotton RE
    Nephron; 1986; 42(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 3510401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Renal fine-needle aspiration cytology in transplanted children.
    Jean G; Berard E; Lacoste M; Habib R; Niaudet P
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Aug; 20(4):623-5. PubMed ID: 3043820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.