BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26526276)

  • 21. The composite N1 component to gaps in noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2648-63. PubMed ID: 16221565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of binaural and monaural cues to identify the lateral position of a virtual object using echoes.
    Rowan D; Papadopoulos T; Edwards D; Allen R
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():32-9. PubMed ID: 25660196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Middle latency auditory-evoked fields reflect psychoacoustic gap detection thresholds in human listeners.
    Rupp A; Gutschalk A; Uppenkamp S; Scherg M
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Oct; 92(4):2239-47. PubMed ID: 15381743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues.
    Starr A; McPherson D; Patterson J; Don M; Luxford W; Shannon R; Sininger Y; Tonakawa L; Waring M
    Brain; 1991 Jun; 114 ( Pt 3)():1157-80. PubMed ID: 2065245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A probabilistic Poisson-based model accounts for an extensive set of absolute auditory threshold measurements.
    Heil P; Matysiak A; Neubauer H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():135-161. PubMed ID: 28716582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2507-18. PubMed ID: 16266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound.
    Alain C; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):126-35. PubMed ID: 22101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Desynchronisation of auditory steady-state responses related to changes in interaural phase differences: an objective measure of binaural hearing.
    Vercammen C; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jul; 56(7):464-471. PubMed ID: 28635497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The binaural temporal window in adults and children.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):401-10. PubMed ID: 17297795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus context affects auditory cortical responses to changes in interaural correlation.
    Chait M; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 98(1):224-31. PubMed ID: 17493921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: older adults.
    Lister JJ; Maxfield ND; Pitt GJ; Gonzalez VB
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):211-25. PubMed ID: 21385014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity to a break in interaural correlation is co-modulated by intensity level and interaural delay.
    Kong L; Xie Z; Lu L; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL114-8. PubMed ID: 22894308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study.
    Rao A; Zhang Y; Miller S
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):123-32. PubMed ID: 20595021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.