835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26526563)
1. A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock.
Doll JA; Ohman EM; Patel MR; Milano CA; Rogers JG; Wohns DH; Kapur NK; Rao SV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):424-33. PubMed ID: 26526563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
Mandawat A; Rao SV
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.
Rab T; O'Neill W
Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Oct; 29(7):410-417. PubMed ID: 30573276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical outcomes of bridge-to-bridge therapy with extracorporeal left ventricular assist device for acute myocardial infarction in cardiogenic shock.
Tokunaga C; Iguchi A; Nakajima H; Chubachi F; Hori Y; Takazawa A; Hayashi J; Asakura T; Yoshitake A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):54. PubMed ID: 35172726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: current concepts and future directions.
Briceno N; Kapur NK; Perera D
Heart; 2016 Sep; 102(18):1494-507. PubMed ID: 27503999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
Reyentovich A; Barghash MH; Hochman JS
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):481-92. PubMed ID: 27356877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revascularisation and mechanical circulatory support in patients with ischaemic cardiogenic shock.
Maznyczka AM; Ford TJ; Oldroyd KG
Heart; 2019 Sep; 105(17):1364-1374. PubMed ID: 31129613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
Werdan K; Gielen S; Ebelt H; Hochman JS
Eur Heart J; 2014 Jan; 35(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 24014384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.
Zhang Q; Han Y; Sun S; Zhang C; Liu H; Wang B; Wei S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35152887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.
Schwartz B; Jain P; Salama M; Kapur NK
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Feb; 19(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 33356662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: pharmacologic and mechanical hemodynamic support pathways.
Graf T; Desch S; Eitel I; Thiele H
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Sep; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 25968304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ECMO and Short-term Support for Cardiogenic Shock in Heart Failure.
Chakaramakkil MJ; Sivathasan C
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2018 Aug; 20(10):87. PubMed ID: 30116917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kar S
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2018 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 29350305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mechanical support in cardiogenic shock].
Graf T; Thiele H
Herz; 2015 Apr; 40(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 25737288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
Wiktor DM; Sawlani N; Kanthi Y; Sipahi I; Fang JC; Blitz A
ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 20938341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term mechanical circulatory support by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of cardiogenic shock and end-stage heart failure.
Brugts JJ; Caliskan K
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 12(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 24417434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
