These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26527023)

  • 1. [Explorations of breast microcalcifications: Guidelines].
    Chamming's F; Chopier J; Mathelin C; Chéreau E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):960-9. PubMed ID: 26527023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The HRT follow-up consultation. What to do in case of breast tumour (clinical or radiological) and microcalcifications. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines].
    Mathelin C; Molière S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 May; 49(5):485-492. PubMed ID: 33757919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
    Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF): benign breast tumors - short text.
    Lavoué V; Fritel X; Antoine M; Beltjens F; Bendifallah S; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boulanger L; Canlorbe G; Catteau-Jonard S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Chamming's F; Chéreau E; Chopier J; Coutant C; Demetz J; Guilhen N; Fauvet R; Kerdraon O; Laas E; Legendre G; Mathelin C; Nadeau C; Naggara IT; Ngô C; Ouldamer L; Rafii A; Roedlich MN; Seror J; Séror JY; Touboul C; Uzan C; Daraï E;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():16-23. PubMed ID: 26967341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ultrasound examination of breast microcalcifications: luxury or necessity?].
    Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Ben Taaritt I; Fournol M
    J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Pt 1):1849-58. PubMed ID: 17213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
    Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Benign breast tumors: Recommendations of Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF)--Short text].
    Lavoué V; Fritel X; Antoine M; Beltjens F; Bendifallah S; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boulanger L; Canlorbe G; Catteau-Jonard S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Chamming's F; Chéreau E; Chopier J; Coutant C; Demetz J; Guilhen N; Fauvet R; Kerdraon O; Laas E; Legendre G; Mathelin C; Nadeau C; Thomassin Naggara I; Ngô C; Ouldamer L; Rafii A; Roedlich MN; Seror J; Séror JY; Touboul C; Uzan C; Daraï E;
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1049-64. PubMed ID: 26541565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concordance of mammographic classifications of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis: Utility of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (fourth edition).
    Coşar ZS; Cetin M; Tepe TK; Cetin R; Zarali AC
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 16274891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
    Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous needle localization of clustered mammary microcalcifications prior to biopsy.
    Threatt B; Appelman H; Dow R; O'Rourke T
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1974 Aug; 121(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 4432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microcalcifications of the breast: how does radiologic classification correlate with histology?
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Wersebe A; Xydeas T; Fischmann A; Vogel U; Fersis N; Claussen CD; Siegmann K
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 16392601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications.
    Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; Hendriks JH; Mali WP
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):312-4. PubMed ID: 15107321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bennani-Baiti B; Baltzer PA
    Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 27788035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
    Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
    Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using an add-on unit.
    Becker L; Taves D; McCurdy L; Muscedere G; Karlik S; Ward S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1451-7. PubMed ID: 11717106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications.
    Monsees BS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1109-21. PubMed ID: 7480659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.