365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26527758)
1. Marker-based method to measure movement between the residual limb and a transtibial prosthetic socket.
Childers WL; Siebert S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):720-728. PubMed ID: 26527758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study.
Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Herlihy DV; Paglia DN; Wetterstrand C; O'Connor JP; Hyre MJ; Loan JP; D'Andrea SE
JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e57329. PubMed ID: 38669065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Sensor Array for the Measurement of Relative Motion in Lower Limb Prosthetic Sockets.
Noll V; Whitmore S; Beckerle P; Rinderknecht S
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 31212837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees.
Gale T; Yang S; McGough R; Fiedler G; Anderst W
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110050. PubMed ID: 33035840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement within transtibial prosthetic sockets.
Jonkergouw N; Prins MR; Donse D; van der Wurff P; van Dieën JH; Buis A; Houdijk H
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9725. PubMed ID: 38678076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 23177920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Experimental Assessment of a 2D-Motion Sensor to Detect Relative Movement between Residual Limb and Prosthetic Socket.
Noll V; Rinderknecht S; Beckerle P
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 29986407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an instrument-assisted dynamic prosthetic alignment technique for individuals with transtibial amputation.
Chen CW; Heim W; Fairley K; Clement RJ; Biddiss E; Torres-Moreno R; Andrysek J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 25762611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moment impulse during walking in transtibial amputees.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Arabian AK; Rosenbaum-Chou TG; Boone DA
J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1315-23. PubMed ID: 24612718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Boone DA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 25121726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound study of the motion of the residual femur within a trans-femoral socket during daily living activities other than gait.
Convery P; Murray KD
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Dec; 25(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 11860096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
