These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26528596)

  • 1. Validity and Reliability of Subjective Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Work.
    Stamford BA
    Ergonomics; 1976 Jan; 19(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 26528596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale.
    Zamunér AR; Moreno MA; Camargo TM; Graetz JP; Rebelo AC; Tamburús NY; da Silva E
    J Sports Sci Med; 2011; 10(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24149305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.
    Chen MJ; Fan X; Moe ST
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during cycling exercises at constant power output.
    Garcin M; Vautier JF; Vandewalle H; Wolff M; Monod H
    Ergonomics; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1500-9. PubMed ID: 9802254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of ratings of perceived exertion soon after myocardial infarction: responses in the stress-testing clinic and the rehabilitation gymnasium.
    Buckley JP; Sim J; Eston RG
    Ergonomics; 2009 Apr; 52(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 19401893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Borg scale is valid for ratings of perceived exertion for individuals with Parkinson's disease.
    Penko AL; Barkley JE; Koop MM; Alberts JL
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2017; 10(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 28479949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests.
    Borg E; Kaijser L
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Feb; 16(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 16430682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study.
    Ciolac EG; Mantuani SS; Neiva CM; Verardi C; Pessôa-Filho DM; Pimenta L
    Biol Sport; 2015 Jun; 32(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 26028809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The validity of submaximal ratings of perceived exertion to predict one repetition maximum.
    Eston R; Evans HJ
    J Sports Sci Med; 2009; 8(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 24149599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological and perceived exertion responses to six modes of submaximal exercise.
    Thomas TR; Ziogas G; Smith T; Zhang Q; Londeree BR
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1995 Sep; 66(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 7481085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exercise intensity: subjective regulation by perceived exertion.
    Smutok MA; Skrinar GS; Pandolf KB
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Dec; 61(12):569-74. PubMed ID: 7458621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability and validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion in step dance sessions.
    Ozkan A; Kin-Isler A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Feb; 21(1):296-300. PubMed ID: 17313260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exercise Intensity and Validity of the Ratings of Perceived Exertion (Borg and OMNI Scales) in an Indoor Cycling Session.
    Muyor JM
    J Hum Kinet; 2013 Dec; 39():93-101. PubMed ID: 24511345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A submaximal treadmill test for developing target ratings of perceived exertion for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.
    Dunbar CC; Glickman-Weiss EL; Bursztyn DA; Kurtich M; Quiroz A; Conley P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):755-9. PubMed ID: 9885032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of endurance training on perceived exertion and stress hormones in women.
    Skrinar GS; Ingram SP; Pandolf KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 2):1239-50. PubMed ID: 6664801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children.
    Leung ML; Chung PK; Leung RW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1047-62. PubMed ID: 12578245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of heart rate responses at given ratings of perceived exertion in cycling and walking.
    Katsanos CS; Moffatt RJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2005 Dec; 76(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 16739681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity, Reliability, and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ratings of Perceived Exertion to Identify Dependence in Performing Self-care Activities in Older Women.
    Martins de Souza D; Born Lopes P; Maria Marcora S; Robertson RJ; Luiz Felix Rodacki A; Nakamura FY; Pereira G
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 30273111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heart rate and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise: a comparison of graded walking and ungraded jogging at a constant perceived exertion.
    Kilpatrick MW; Kraemer RR; Quigley EJ; Mears JL; Powers JM; Dedea AJ; Ferrer NF
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Mar; 27(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 19204846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.