These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26528728)

  • 1. Method Effects on an Adaptation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Greek and the Role of Personality Traits.
    Michaelides MP; Koutsogiorgi C; Panayiotou G
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 26528728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
    Marsh HW; Scalas LF; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Jun; 22(2):366-81. PubMed ID: 20528064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extending Structural Analyses of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to Consider Criterion-Related Validity: Can Composite Self-Esteem Scores Be Good Enough?
    Donnellan MB; Ackerman RA; Brecheen C
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 26192536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factor structure of the private self-consciousness scale: role of item wording.
    Ben-Artzi E
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 14638450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: a bifactor answer to a two-factor question?
    McKay MT; Boduszek D; Harvey SA
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 24940657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wording Effects in Assessment: Missing the Trees for the Forest.
    Ponce FP; Irribarra DT; Vergés A; Arias VB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):718-734. PubMed ID: 34048313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
    Gnambs T; Schroeders U
    Assessment; 2020 Mar; 27(2):404-418. PubMed ID: 29254352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use.
    Orosz G; Benyó M; Berkes B; Nikoletti E; Gál É; Tóth-Király I; Bőthe B
    J Behav Addict; 2018 Jun; 7(2):301-316. PubMed ID: 29642722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation, Validation, Reliability and Factorial Equivalence of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Colombian and Spanish Population.
    Gómez-Lugo M; Espada JP; Morales A; Marchal-Bertrand L; Soler F; Vallejo-Medina P
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 19():E66. PubMed ID: 27737723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construct Validity and Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Its Association with Spiritual Values Within Irish Population.
    Kielkiewicz K; Mathúna CÓ; McLaughlin C
    J Relig Health; 2020 Feb; 59(1):381-398. PubMed ID: 31054063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the Three-and the Five-factor personality models.
    Aluja A; Rolland JP; García LF; Rossier J
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Apr; 88(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 17437388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].
    Pinaquy S; Chabrol H; Barbe P
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 12232536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale.
    Alessandri G; Vecchione M; Eisenberg N; Łaguna M
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):621-35. PubMed ID: 25580614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale.
    Davis C; Kellett S; Beail N
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 May; 114(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19374464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct and indirect predictors of social anxiety: The role of anxiety sensitivity, behavioral inhibition, experiential avoidance and self-consciousness.
    Panayiotou G; Karekla M; Panayiotou M
    Compr Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 55(8):1875-82. PubMed ID: 25214373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the Bifactor Model a Better Model or Is It Just Better at Modeling Implausible Responses? Application of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
    Reise SP; Kim DS; Mansolf M; Widaman KF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):818-838. PubMed ID: 27834509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wording effects and the factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
    Molina JG; Rodrigo MF; Losilla JM; Vives J
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):1031-7. PubMed ID: 24708077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 14567164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bifactor Structure for the Categorical Chinese Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
    Xu M; Leung SO
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 19():E67. PubMed ID: 27724991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relevance of security: A latent domain of attachment relationships.
    Mannarini S; Boffo M
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24303992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.