These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26528874)

  • 21. A multicentre comparative evaluation: washable pants with an integral pad for light incontinence.
    Clarke-O'Neill S; Pettersson L; Fader M; Dean G; Brooks R; Cottenden A
    J Clin Nurs; 2002 Jan; 11(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 11845759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What makes men leak? An investigation of objective and self-report measures of urinary incontinence early after radical prostatectomy.
    Mungovan SF; Huijbers BP; Hirschhorn AD; Patel MI
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Feb; 35(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 25418678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of the usage of continence pads and help-seeking behavior of women with stress urinary incontinence in Poland.
    Grzybowska ME; Wydra D; Smutek J
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Sep; 15():80. PubMed ID: 26423398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: can men at risk be identified preoperatively?
    Moore KN; Truong V; Estey E; Voaklander DC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):270-9; quiz 280-1. PubMed ID: 17505246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of an absorbent dressing specifically for fecal incontinence.
    Bliss DZ; Savik K
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 18344799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Significance of pad test loss for the evaluation of women with urinary incontinence.
    Paick JS; Ku JH; Shin JW; Park K; Son H; Oh SJ; Kim SW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15468291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quantification of urine leaks: standardized one-hour pad test].
    Batista Miranda JE; Da Silva Virgilio F; Granda Contijoch M; Puigpelat Font T; Errando Smet C; Araño Bertrán P
    Actas Urol Esp; 1997 Feb; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9214206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correlation of patient perception of pad use with objective degree of incontinence measured by pad test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: the SUFU Pad Test Study.
    Nitti VW; Mourtzinos A; Brucker BM;
    J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):836-42. PubMed ID: 24650425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting the leakage performance of bodyworn disposable incontinence pads using laboratory tests.
    Cottenden AM; Ledger DJ
    J Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 15(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 8320980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Continence products: research priorities to improve the lives of people with urinary and/or fecal leakage.
    Fader M; Bliss D; Cottenden A; Moore K; Norton C
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Apr; 29(4):640-4. PubMed ID: 20432328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The effect of a vaginal device on urinary leakage and quality of life of women with stress urinary incontinence].
    Sander P; Thyssen HH; Lose G; Andersen JT
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3038-41. PubMed ID: 10850193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence.
    Tsui JF; Shah MB; Weinberger JM; Ghanaat M; Weiss JP; Purohit RS; Blaivas JG
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1787-90. PubMed ID: 23727311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The development of national quality performance standards for disposable absorbent products for adult incontinence.
    Muller N; McInnis E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Sep; 59(9):40-55. PubMed ID: 24018391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population.
    Bishoff JT; Motley G; Optenberg SA; Stein CR; Moon KA; Browning SM; Sabanegh E; Foley JP; Thompson IM
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 9679897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Exploratory Study of Skin Problems Experienced by UK Nursing Home Residents Using Different Pad Designs.
    Clarke-OʼNeill S; Farbrot A; Lagerstedt ML; Cottenden A; Fader M
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(6):621-31; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 26333205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A trial of devices for urinary incontinence after treatment for prostate cancer.
    Macaulay M; Broadbridge J; Gage H; Williams P; Birch B; Moore KN; Cottenden A; Fader MJ
    BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):432-42. PubMed ID: 25496354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A multicenter comparative evaluation: disposable pads for women with light incontinence.
    Clarke-O'Neill S; Pettersson L; Fader M; Cottenden A; Brooks R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 15128093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a real-world population of women aged 45-60 years: results from a survey in France, Germany, the UK and the USA.
    Abrams P; Smith AP; Cotterill N
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24958472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Men's satisfaction with female/unisex and male incontinence pads: a comparative clinical audit.
    Broom R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2023 Oct; 28(10):479-484. PubMed ID: 37793108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.