125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26529040)
1. Inhibitory Effects of 2,2'-Dipyridyl and 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-Galloyl-b-D-Glucopyranose on Biofilm Formation in Contact Lens Cases.
Cho P; Shi GS; Boost M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7053-7. PubMed ID: 26529040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibitory effects of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucopyranose on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus.
Lin MH; Chang FR; Hua MY; Wu YC; Liu ST
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2011 Mar; 55(3):1021-7. PubMed ID: 21173176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial and fungal biofilm formation on contact lenses and their susceptibility to lens care solutions.
Kackar S; Suman E; Kotian MS
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2017; 35(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 28303823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organoselenium Polymer Inhibits Biofilm Formation in Polypropylene Contact Lens Case Material.
Tran PL; Huynh E; Pham P; Lacky B; Jarvis C; Mosley T; Hamood AN; Hanes R; Reid T
Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 26974534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a warming device on contact lens case contamination.
Willcox MD; Zhu H; Vijay AK
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Nov; 38(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 22868901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Involvement of iron in biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus.
Lin MH; Shu JC; Huang HY; Cheng YC
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e34388. PubMed ID: 22479621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.
Szczotka-Flynn LB; Imamura Y; Chandra J; Yu C; Mukherjee PK; Pearlman E; Ghannoum MA
Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):918-26. PubMed ID: 19654521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial biofilm in silver-impregnated contact lens cases.
Vijay AK; Zhu H; Willcox M; Ketelson H; Stapleton F
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):408-412. PubMed ID: 31767527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of contact lens solutions.
Kal A; Toker MI; Kaya S
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1103-1114. PubMed ID: 27738866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel antibiofilm technology for contact lens solutions.
Farber BF; Hsieh HC; Donnenfeld ED; Perry HD; Epstein A; Wolff A
Ophthalmology; 1995 May; 102(5):831-6. PubMed ID: 7777284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of biofilm formation in bacterial isolates from contact lens wearers.
Raksha L; Gangashettappa N; Shantala GB; Nandan BR; Sinha D
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 68(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 31856459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of prevention and disruption of biofilm in contact lens cases.
Cho P; Boost MV
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Sep; 39(5):337-349. PubMed ID: 31435968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Antibiofilm efficacy of nitric oxide on soft contact lenses.
Kim DJ; Park JH; Kim M; Park CY
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):206. PubMed ID: 29162075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of contact lens multipurpose solutions on bacterial biofilm development.
Artini M; Cellini A; Scoarughi GL; Papa R; Tilotta M; Palma S; Selan L
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 May; 41(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 25828515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial transmission from lens storage cases to contact lenses-Effects of lens care solutions and silver impregnation of cases.
Vermeltfoort PB; Hooymans JM; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Oct; 87(1):237-43. PubMed ID: 18435398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of biofilm from contact lens storage cases.
Wu YT; Zhu H; Willcox M; Stapleton F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6329-33. PubMed ID: 20720230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activity of multipurpose contact lens solutions against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Candida albicans biofilms.
Mendonca JR; Dantas LR; Tuon FF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 37329192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact lens disinfecting solutions antibacterial efficacy: comparison between clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Mohammadinia M; Rahmani S; Eslami G; Ghassemi-Broumand M; Aghazadh Amiri M; Aghaie G; Tabatabaee SM; Taheri S; Behgozin A
Eye (Lond); 2012 Feb; 26(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 22094301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ozone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in contact lenses storage cases.
Oliver JC; Bredarioli PAP; Leandro FD; Ferreira CBRJ; Veiga SMOM; Dias ALT
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2019 Apr; 61():e23. PubMed ID: 31017184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disruption of contact lens-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms formed in the presence of neutrophils.
Robertson DM; Parks QM; Young RL; Kret J; Poch KR; Malcolm KC; Nichols DP; Nichols M; Zhu M; Cavanagh HD; Nick JA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2844-50. PubMed ID: 21245396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
