727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26530230)
1. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.
Mi Y; Ren K; Pan H; Zhu L; Wu S; You X; Shao H; Dai F; Peng T; Qin F; Wang J; Huang Y
Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 26530230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.
Hyams ES; Munver R; Bird VG; Uberoi J; Shah O
J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1583-8. PubMed ID: 20629566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Flexible Holmium Laser Sheath in Rigid Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones.
Xiong Y; Liu J; Zhao T
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 36914419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs. flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lv G; Qi W; Gao H; Zhou Y; Zhong M; Wang K; Liu Y; Zhang Q; Zhou C; Li Y; Zhang L; Zhang D
Front Surg; 2022; 9():925481. PubMed ID: 36420414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.
Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10-20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients.
Cecen K; Karadag MA; Demir A; Bagcioglu M; Kocaaslan R; Sofikerim M
Springerplus; 2014; 3(1):557. PubMed ID: 25332859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.
Barreto L; Jung JH; Abdelrahim A; Ahmed M; Dawkins GPC; Kazmierski M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD010784. PubMed ID: 29859007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis.
Zheng C; Yang H; Luo J; Xiong B; Wang H; Jiang Q
Urolithiasis; 2015 Nov; 43(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 26211003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors for flexible ureterorenoscopy requirement after rigid ureterorenoscopy in cases with renal pelvic stones sized 1 to 2 cm.
Süer E; Gülpinar Ö; Özcan C; Göğüş Ç; Kerimov S; Şafak M
Korean J Urol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 25685301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones compared with other renal locations.
Jacquemet B; Martin L; Pastori J; Bailly V; Guichard G; Bernardini S; Chabannes E; Bittard H; Kleinclauss F
J Endourol; 2014 Oct; 28(10):1183-7. PubMed ID: 24811281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
