241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2653039)
1. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Sabbagha RE; Minogue J; Tamura RK; Hungerford SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Apr; 160(4):854-60; discussion 860-2. PubMed ID: 2653039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic prediction of birth weight in preterm fetuses: which formula is best?
Pielet BW; Sabbagha RE; MacGregor SN; Tamura RK; Feigenbaum SL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Dec; 157(6):1411-4. PubMed ID: 3322016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Warshafsky C; Ronzoni S; Quaglietta P; Weiner E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N; Aviram A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33607956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New formula for estimating fetal weight below 1000 g: comparison with existing formulas.
Scott F; Beeby P; Abbott J; Edelman D; Boogert A
J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Oct; 15(10):669-72. PubMed ID: 8887237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Ancel PY; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):476.e1-476.e12. PubMed ID: 30118693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
Hedriana HL; Moore TR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.
Robson SC; Gallivan S; Walkinshaw SA; Vaughan J; Rodeck CH
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 8355934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas in Assessing Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
Barel O; Maymon R; Elovits M; Smorgick N; Tovbin J; Vaknin Z
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Jun; 37(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 25075910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies.
Alsulyman OM; Ouzounian JG; Kjos SL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):503-6. PubMed ID: 9322614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
Santolaya-Forgas J; Meyer WJ; Gauthier DW; Kahn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
Rosati P; Arduini M; Giri C; Guariglia L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of sonographic formulas for estimating fetal weight below 1,250 g: a series of 119 cases.
Jouannic JM; Grangé G; Goffinet F; Benachi A; Carbrol D
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2001; 16(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 11433125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
