BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26530659)

  • 1. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Change in pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal surgery.
    Kim HJ; Kwon OH; Chang BS; Lee CK; Chun HJ; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 28669860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of pain catastrophizing in clinical manifestations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: mediation analysis with bootstrapping.
    Kim HJ; Cho CH; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2015 Feb; 15(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 25239153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result.
    Shen F; Kim HJ; Lee NK; Chun HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2018-2024. PubMed ID: 29679727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sleep Disturbance in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Association With Disability and Quality of Life.
    Lee NK; Jeon SW; Heo YW; Shen F; Kim HJ; Yoon IY; Chang BS; Lee CK; Chun HJ; Yeom JS
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 May; 33(4):E185-E190. PubMed ID: 31972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of pain sensitivity on the treatment outcome of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Lee JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Lee GW; Im SB; Kim HJ
    Pain Pract; 2014 Jun; 14(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 23734752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].
    Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability].
    Gu GF; Zhang HL; He SS; Gu X; Zhang LG; Ding Y; Jia JB; Zhou X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1081-5. PubMed ID: 22333447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
    Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.