These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26530827)

  • 1. Language, terminology and the readability of online cancer information.
    Peters P; Smith A; Funk Y; Boyages J
    Med Humanit; 2016 Mar; 42(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26530827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.
    Singh PM; Wight CA; Sercinoglu O; Wilson DC; Boytsov A; Raizada MN
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e18. PubMed ID: 17613488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health information text characteristics.
    Leroy G; Eryilmaz E; Laroya BT
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():479-83. PubMed ID: 17238387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable?
    Boulos MN
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Jun; 7(3):528-35. PubMed ID: 15929685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Readability of health web pages for patients and readers among the general population].
    Blanco Pérez A; Gutiérrez Couto U
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2002; 76(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 12216172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
    Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health literacy and the World Wide Web: comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet.
    Friedman DB; Hoffman-Goetz L; Arocha JF
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2006 Mar; 31(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 16754369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of Korean-Language COVID-19 Information from the South Korean National COVID-19 Portal Intended for the General Public: Cross-sectional Infodemiology Study.
    Moon H; Lee GH; Cho YJ
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e30085. PubMed ID: 35072633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health literacy training for health professions students.
    Hadden KB
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jul; 98(7):918-20. PubMed ID: 25850755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
    Pothier L; Pothier DD
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universally Designed Text on the Web: Towards Readability Criteria Based on Anti-Patterns.
    Eika E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 229():461-70. PubMed ID: 27534341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.
    Shukla P; Sanghvi SP; Lelkes VM; Kumar A; Contractor S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 23452554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.
    Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction.
    Vargas CR; Kantak NA; Chuang DJ; Koolen PG; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 199(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 26088084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.