These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. Moore LJ; Wilson MR; Waine E; Masters RS; McGrath JS; Vine SJ J Robot Surg; 2015 Mar; 9(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26530974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer. Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial. Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance. Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Performance: 2D Versus 3D Vision and Classic Instrument Versus New Hand-Held Robotic Device for Laparoscopy. Leite M; Carvalho AF; Costa P; Pereira R; Moreira A; Rodrigues N; Laureano S; Correia-Pinto J; Vilaça JL; Leão P Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 25994623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices. Passerotti CC; Franco F; Bissoli JC; Tiseo B; Oliveira CM; Buchalla CA; Inoue GN; Sencan A; Sencan A; do Pardo RR; Nguyen HT Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1075-84. PubMed ID: 25913053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion. Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience. Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. Pérez-Salazar MJ; Caballero D; Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 38931624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer and priming of surgical skills across minimally invasive surgical platforms. Zihni A; Ge T; Ray S; Wang R; Liang Z; Cavallo JA; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 27916374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. Cundy TP; Marcus HJ; Hughes-Hallett A; MacKinnon T; Najmaldin AS; Yang GZ; Darzi A BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25382019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-assisted Suturing Performance Among Novice Surgeons: A Blinded, Cross-Over Study. Møller SG; Dohrn N; Brisling SK; Larsen JCR; Klein M Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Apr; 30(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 32039938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. Narula VK; Watson WC; Davis SS; Hinshaw K; Needleman BJ; Mikami DJ; Hazey JW; Winston JH; Muscarella P; Rubin M; Patel V; Melvin WS Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2258-61. PubMed ID: 17522931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. Klein MI; Warm JS; Riley MA; Matthews G; Doarn C; Donovan JF; Gaitonde K J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1089-94. PubMed ID: 22429084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]