These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26530839)

  • 21. Analysis of the posture pattern during robotic simulator tasks using an optical motion capture system.
    Takayasu K; Yoshida K; Mishima T; Watanabe M; Matsuda T; Kinoshita H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):183-190. PubMed ID: 28664432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.
    Zárate Rodriguez JG; Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ray S; Cho S; Awad MM
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 30350099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy.
    Lebeau T; Rouprêt M; Ferhi K; Chartier-Kastler E; Bitker MO; Richard F; Vaessen C
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 22556136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon.
    Feng X; Morandi A; Boehne M; Imvised T; Ure BM; Kuebler JF; Lacher M
    Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 25673344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.
    Gallagher AG; Smith CD; Bowers SP; Seymour NE; Pearson A; McNatt S; Hananel D; Satava RM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Sep; 197(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 12946803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery.
    Moss EL; Sarhanis P; Ind T; Smith M; Davies Q; Zecca M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 31326633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system.
    Rashidi L; Neighorn C; Bastawrous A
    Am J Surg; 2017 May; 213(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28408112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.
    Juo YY; Mantha A; Abiri A; Lin A; Dutson E
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1405-1413. PubMed ID: 28842801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybrid Robotics for Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Preclinical Evaluation and Surgeon First Impression.
    Zappa F; Mattavelli D; Madoglio A; Rampinelli V; Ferrari M; Tampalini F; Fontanella M; Nicolai P; Doglietto F;
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e572-e580. PubMed ID: 31678446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
    Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery.
    Suh I; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Siu KC
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Sep; 7(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 21688381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic Surgery Improves Technical Performance and Enhances Prefrontal Activation During High Temporal Demand.
    Singh H; Modi HN; Ranjan S; Dilley JWR; Airantzis D; Yang GZ; Darzi A; Leff DR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1621-1636. PubMed ID: 29869104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes.
    Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?
    Meier M; Horton K; John H
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 27334771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
    Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Establishing a pediatric robotic surgery program in Canada.
    Bütter A; Merritt N; Dave S
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):207-210. PubMed ID: 27785727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.