These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26531206)
41. Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives. Canda AE; Balbay MD Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(6):908-15; discussion 913. PubMed ID: 25994643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is previous experience in laparoscopic necessary to perform robotic radical prostatectomy? A comparative study with robotic and the classic open procedure in patients with prostate cancer. Lott FM; Favorito LA Acta Cir Bras; 2015 Mar; 30(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 25790013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison of the robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy. Laviana AA; Hu JC Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2013 Sep; 65(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 23872627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Models of assessment of comparative outcomes of robot-assisted surgery: best evidence regarding the superiority or inferiority of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Gandaglia G; Trinh QD Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 25306171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Impact of a single-surgeon learning curve on complications, positioning injuries, and renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Di Pierro GB; Wirth JG; Ferrari M; Danuser H; Mattei A Urology; 2014 Nov; 84(5):1106-11. PubMed ID: 25443913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using near-infrared fluorescence technology and indocyanine green: initial experience. Mangano MS; De Gobbi A; Beniamin F; Lamon C; Ciaccia M; Maccatrozzo L Urologia; 2018 Feb; 85(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 28574144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative investigation on clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between experienced open prostatic surgeons and novice open surgeons in a laparoscopically naïve center with a limited caseload. Sumitomo M; Kanao K; Kato Y; Yoshizawa T; Watanabe M; Zennami K; Nakamura K Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 25721437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P; Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Side docking of the da Vinci robotic system for radical prostatectomy: advantages over traditional docking. Cestari A; Ferrari M; Zanoni M; Sangalli M; Ghezzi M; Fabbri F; Sozzi F; Rigatti P J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 26531205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Retzus-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a step-by-step technique description of this first brazilian experience. Tobias-Machado M; Nunes-Silva I; Hidaka AK; Sato LL; Almeida R; Colombo JR; Zampolli HC; Pompeo AC Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(6):1250. PubMed ID: 27649115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data. Dagrosa LM; Ingimarsson JP; Gorlov IP; Higgins JH; Hyams ES J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 27263110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary? Danuser H; Di Pierro GB; Stucki P; Mattei A BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):963-9. PubMed ID: 23356829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]