These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26534847)

  • 1. Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile.
    Strayer DL; Turrill J; Cooper JM; Coleman JR; Medeiros-Ward N; Biondi F
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1300-24. PubMed ID: 26534847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SPIDER: A Framework for Understanding Driver Distraction.
    Strayer DL; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 26715688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation.
    Patten CJ; Kircher A; Ostlund J; Nilsson L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 15003578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural equation model analysis for the evaluation of overall driving performance: A driving simulator study focusing on driver distraction.
    Papantoniou P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 29087738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of cognitive workload of in-vehicle systems using a visual peripheral and tactile detection task setting.
    Bengler K; Kohlmann M; Lange C
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4919-23. PubMed ID: 22317480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mild Cognitive Impairment and driving: Does in-vehicle distraction affect driving performance?
    Beratis IN; Pavlou D; Papadimitriou E; Andronas N; Kontaxopoulou D; Fragkiadaki S; Yannis G; Papageorgiou SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():148-155. PubMed ID: 28441517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of visual and cognitive distractions on operational and tactical driving behaviors.
    Zhang Y; Kaber DB; Rogers M; Liang Y; Gangakhedkar S
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):592-604. PubMed ID: 24930178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway.
    Lee JD; Caven B; Haake S; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 12002011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Providing views of the driving scene to drivers' conversation partners mitigates cell-phone-related distraction.
    Gaspar JG; Street WN; Windsor MB; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Kramer AF; Mathewson KE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2136-46. PubMed ID: 25304886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does attention capacity moderate the effect of driver distraction in older drivers?
    Cuenen A; Jongen EM; Brijs T; Brijs K; Lutin M; Van Vlierden K; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():12-20. PubMed ID: 25667202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study.
    Sonnleitner A; Treder MS; Simon M; Willmann S; Ewald A; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():110-8. PubMed ID: 24144496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.
    Drews FA; Pasupathi M; Strayer DL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):392-400. PubMed ID: 19102621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TVAR modeling of EEG to detect audio distraction during simulated driving.
    Dahal N; Nandagopal DN; Cocks B; Vijayalakshmi R; Dasari N; Gaertner P
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036012. PubMed ID: 24809969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.