These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26535003)

  • 1. COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.
    Mourik JE; van der Tol P; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):303-7. PubMed ID: 26535003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.
    Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L
    Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance.
    Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS
    Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Boot MV; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 16132918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS.
    Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Klaerke B; Andersen PE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):252-265. PubMed ID: 30809672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
    Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL PAEDIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY.
    Menser B; Manke D; Mentrup D; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):371-7. PubMed ID: 26628612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
    E A; A Y; T O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system.
    Carlander A; Hansson J; Söderberg J; Steneryd K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):275-80. PubMed ID: 20200106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cu filtration for dose reduction in neonatal chest imaging.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Smet M; Bosmans H; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):281-6. PubMed ID: 20179072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
    Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Lo JY; Dobbins JT; Jesneck JL; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2687-98. PubMed ID: 15487752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.