These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26535447)

  • 1. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ToxRead: a tool to assist in read across and its use to assess mutagenicity of chemicals.
    Gini G; Franchi AM; Manganaro A; Golbamaki A; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(12):999-1011. PubMed ID: 25511972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria and Application on the Use of Nontesting Methods within a Weight of Evidence Strategy.
    Lombardo A; Raitano G; Gadaleta D; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():199-218. PubMed ID: 29934894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between bioconcentration factor (BCF) data provided by industry to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and data derived from QSAR models.
    Petoumenou MI; Pizzo F; Cester J; Fernández A; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():529-34. PubMed ID: 26282223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of QSAR models for bioconcentration suitable for REACH.
    Gissi A; Nicolotti O; Carotti A; Gadaleta D; Lombardo A; Benfenati E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():325-32. PubMed ID: 23624006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting the partition coefficient (log P) of chemicals under the REACH regulation.
    Cappelli CI; Benfenati E; Cester J
    Environ Res; 2015 Nov; 143(Pt A):26-32. PubMed ID: 26432472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CATALOGIC 301C model - validation and improvement.
    Dimitrova NH; Dermen IA; Todorova ND; Vasilev KG; Dimitrov SD; Mekenyan OG; Ikenaga Y; Aoyagi T; Zaitsu Y; Hamaguchi C
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):511-524. PubMed ID: 28728491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The VEGAHUB Platform: The Philosophy and the Tools.
    Roncaglioni A; Lombardo A; Benfenati E
    Altern Lab Anim; 2022 Mar; 50(2):121-135. PubMed ID: 35382564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre.
    Pavan M; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(7-8):785-99. PubMed ID: 19061088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expert QSAR system for predicting the bioconcentration factor under the REACH regulation.
    Grisoni F; Consonni V; Vighi M; Villa S; Todeschini R
    Environ Res; 2016 Jul; 148():507-512. PubMed ID: 27152714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular Similarity in Computational Toxicology.
    Floris M; Olla S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():171-179. PubMed ID: 29934892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative QSAR-based approach for predicting the bioconcentration factor for regulatory purposes.
    Gissi A; Gadaleta D; Floris M; Olla S; Carotti A; Novellino E; Benfenati E; Nicolotti O
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 24247988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Read-across approaches--misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead.
    Patlewicz G; Ball N; Becker RA; Booth ED; Cronin MT; Kroese D; Steup D; van Ravenzwaay B; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 25368965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the bioconcentration factor of highly hydrophobic organic chemicals.
    Garg R; Smith CJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 69():252-9. PubMed ID: 24759698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations.
    Patlewicz G; Ball N; Booth ED; Hulzebos E; Zvinavashe E; Hennes C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23764304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Read-Across Tools.
    Manganelli S; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():305-22. PubMed ID: 27311471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nontest Methods to Predict Acute Toxicity: State of the Art for Applications of In Silico Methods.
    Bureau R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():519-534. PubMed ID: 29934909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards quantitative read across: Prediction of Ames mutagenicity in a large database.
    Benigni R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104434. PubMed ID: 31374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.